PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGME vs. XRMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGME vs. XRMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise GME Option Income Strategy ETF (IGME) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGME achieves a 16.18% return, which is significantly higher than XRMI's 3.42% return.


IGME

1D
-1.26%
1M
3.48%
6M
9.69%
YTD
16.18%
1Y
3.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XRMI

1D
-0.03%
1M
1.27%
6M
2.67%
YTD
3.42%
1Y
9.91%
3Y*
6.85%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGME vs. XRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IGME and XRMI is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2025

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGME vs. XRMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGME
IGME Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
IGME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGME Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGME Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
IGME Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGME Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

XRMI
XRMI Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
XRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
XRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGME vs. XRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise GME Option Income Strategy ETF (IGME) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IGMEXRMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.35

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

1.98

-1.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.28

7.99

-7.71

IGME vs. XRMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGME Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the XRMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGME and XRMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IGME vs. XRMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGME drawdown since its inception was -26.33%, which is greater than XRMI's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGME and XRMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGMEXRMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.33%

-15.31%

-11.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.70%

-5.02%

-20.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.51%

-0.03%

-12.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.32%

-5.80%

-8.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.77%

1.24%

+11.53%

Volatility

IGME vs. XRMI - Volatility Comparison

Bitwise GME Option Income Strategy ETF (IGME) has a higher volatility of 6.57% compared to Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) at 1.10%. This indicates that IGME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XRMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGMEXRMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.57%

1.10%

+5.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.08%

4.41%

+14.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.03%

5.54%

+21.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.31%

6.87%

+27.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.31%

6.87%

+27.44%

IGME vs. XRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGME has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than XRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGME vs. XRMI - Dividend Comparison

IGME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 88.66%, more than XRMI's 12.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
IGME
Bitwise GME Option Income Strategy ETF
88.66%69.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XRMI
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF
12.51%12.35%11.86%12.62%12.84%2.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGME and XRMI have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGME has higher volatility (6.57%) compared to XRMI (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGME dropped -26.33% vs XRMI's -15.31%.

On 1-year performance, XRMI leads with 9.91% vs 3.60% for IGME. On fees, XRMI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, XRMI has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XRMI has performed better with a 9.91% return vs 3.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XRMI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for IGME.

IGME has the higher dividend yield at 88.66%, compared with 12.51% for XRMI.

They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for IGME and 0.60% for XRMI.

XRMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGME and XRMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer