PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGM vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGM vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGM achieves a 23.42% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 29.56% return. Over the past 10 years, IGM has outperformed XLE with an annualized return of 24.57%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.91% annualized return.


IGM

1D
0.69%
1M
3.04%
YTD
23.42%
6M
23.24%
1Y
48.57%
3Y*
35.37%
5Y*
20.09%
10Y*
24.57%

XLE

1D
0.75%
1M
-0.14%
YTD
29.56%
6M
28.37%
1Y
37.19%
3Y*
16.18%
5Y*
20.12%
10Y*
9.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGM vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
23.42%26.76%36.99%60.68%-35.83%25.72%45.11%41.81%2.26%37.20%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
29.56%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between IGM and XLE is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2001

0.41

The correlation between IGM and XLE shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IGM vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IGM
XLE

Technology

82.8%

-

Communication Services

16.8%

-

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Industrials

0.2%

-

Energy

0.1%
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

IGM
82.8%
XLE

-

Communication Services

IGM
16.8%
XLE

-

Financial Services

IGM
0.2%
XLE

-

Industrials

IGM
0.2%
XLE

-

Energy

IGM
0.1%
XLE
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IGM
0.1%
XLE

-

Basic Materials

IGM

-

XLE

-

Consumer Defensive

IGM

-

XLE

-

Healthcare

IGM

-

XLE

-

Real Estate

IGM

-

XLE

-

Utilities

IGM

-

XLE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGM vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGM
IGM Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
IGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGM Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
IGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGM Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGM vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IGMXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.30

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

3.10

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.06

8.63

+1.43

IGM vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGM Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGM and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IGM vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGM drawdown since its inception was -65.59%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGM and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGMXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.59%

-71.26%

+5.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.44%

-12.05%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.39%

-20.14%

-6.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.68%

-26.04%

-14.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.68%

-66.81%

+26.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.80%

-8.01%

+1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.22%

-17.97%

+2.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.84%

4.32%

+0.52%

Volatility

IGM vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) has a higher volatility of 10.03% compared to State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) at 7.26%. This indicates that IGM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGMXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.03%

7.26%

+2.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.11%

16.79%

+1.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.98%

20.57%

+1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.91%

26.05%

-0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.66%

29.58%

-4.92%

IGM vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGM vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

IGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than XLE's 2.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
0.13%0.17%0.22%0.33%0.66%0.16%0.32%0.50%0.57%0.57%0.90%0.79%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.59%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGM and XLE have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGM has higher volatility (10.03%) compared to XLE (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGM dropped -65.59% vs XLE's -71.26%.

On 10-year performance, IGM leads with 24.57% vs 9.91% for XLE. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLE has been the lower-risk option at 7.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IGM has performed better with a 24.57% return vs 9.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGM.

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 0.13% for IGM.

IGM is categorized as Technology Equities, while XLE is Energy Equities. IGM tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGM and 0.08% for XLE.

IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGM and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer