IGM vs. TPYP
IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) and TPYP (Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - IGM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index, while TPYP is a MLPs fund tracking the Tortoise North American Pipeline Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGM returned 23.82%/yr vs 11.32%/yr for TPYP. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IGM charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for TPYP.
Performance
IGM vs. TPYP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGM achieves a 25.65% return, which is significantly higher than TPYP's 20.31% return. Over the past 10 years, IGM has outperformed TPYP with an annualized return of 23.82%, while TPYP has yielded a comparatively lower 11.32% annualized return.
IGM
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 31.39%
- YTD
- 25.65%
- 1Y
- 41.22%
- 3Y*
- 35.21%
- 5Y*
- 18.82%
- 10Y*
- 23.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.63%
TPYP
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 10.96%
- YTD
- 20.31%
- 1Y
- 22.13%
- 3Y*
- 23.42%
- 5Y*
- 18.93%
- 10Y*
- 11.32%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $59.17M | $51.24M | $82.50M | |
| $2.68M | $2.32M | $2.66M |
IGM vs. TPYP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 25.65% | 26.76% | 36.99% | 60.68% | -35.83% | 25.72% | 45.11% | 41.81% | 2.26% | 37.20% |
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 20.31% | 7.59% | 37.37% | 10.51% | 16.09% | 34.97% | -20.99% | 23.35% | -11.13% | 2.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGM and TPYP is -0.22, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2015 | 0.32 |
The correlation between IGM and TPYP shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IGM vs. TPYP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGM
TPYP
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
IGM
TPYP
-
Communication Services
IGM
TPYP
-
Industrials
IGM
TPYP
Financial Services
IGM
TPYP
Energy
IGM
TPYP
Consumer Cyclical
IGM
TPYP
-
Basic Materials
IGM
TPYP
Consumer Defensive
IGM
-
TPYP
-
Healthcare
IGM
-
TPYP
-
Real Estate
IGM
-
TPYP
-
Utilities
IGM
-
TPYP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGM vs. TPYP — Risk / Return Rank
IGM
TPYP
IGM vs. TPYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGM | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.27 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.52 | 3.25 | -0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.22 | 7.64 | -0.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGM vs. TPYP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGM drawdown since its inception was -65.59%, which is greater than TPYP's maximum drawdown of -51.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGM and TPYP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGM | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.59% | -51.91% | -13.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.44% | -6.84% | -9.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.39% | -13.17% | -13.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.68% | -17.96% | -22.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.68% | -51.91% | +11.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.12% | -5.54% | +0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.18% | -7.82% | -7.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.72% | 2.91% | +2.81% |
Volatility
IGM vs. TPYP - Volatility Comparison
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) has a higher volatility of 9.13% compared to Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) at 4.74%. This indicates that IGM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPYP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGM | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.13% | 4.74% | +4.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.62% | 11.18% | +9.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.63% | 13.98% | +10.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.43% | 17.41% | +9.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.88% | 21.90% | +2.98% |
IGM vs. TPYP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than TPYP's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGM vs. TPYP - Dividend Comparison
IGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than TPYP's 3.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.66% | 0.16% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.90% | 0.79% |
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 3.28% | 3.91% | 3.95% | 4.83% | 4.48% | 4.86% | 6.14% | 4.45% | 4.58% | 3.71% | 3.49% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGM and TPYP have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGM has higher volatility (9.13%) compared to TPYP (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGM dropped -65.59% vs TPYP's -51.91%.
On 10-year performance, IGM leads with 23.82% vs 11.32% for TPYP. On fees, IGM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, TPYP has been the lower-risk option at 4.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IGM has performed better with a 23.82% return vs 11.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for TPYP.
TPYP has the higher dividend yield at 3.28%, compared with 0.13% for IGM.
IGM is categorized as Technology Equities, while TPYP is MLPs. IGM tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index, while TPYP tracks Tortoise North American Pipeline Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Tortoise. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGM and 0.40% for TPYP.
IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGM and TPYP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer