IGM vs. TDV
IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) and TDV (ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - IGM tracks the S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index while TDV tracks the Zacks 2040 Lifecycle Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IGM returned 22.04%/yr vs 13.94%/yr for TDV. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IGM charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for TDV.
Performance
IGM vs. TDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGM achieves a 31.32% return, which is significantly higher than TDV's 23.09% return.
IGM
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 16.93%
- YTD
- 31.32%
- 6M
- 29.19%
- 1Y
- 62.26%
- 3Y*
- 39.18%
- 5Y*
- 22.04%
- 10Y*
- 25.19%
TDV
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 10.03%
- YTD
- 23.09%
- 6M
- 21.07%
- 1Y
- 36.07%
- 3Y*
- 20.49%
- 5Y*
- 13.94%
- 10Y*
- —
IGM vs. TDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 31.32% | 26.76% | 36.99% | 60.68% | -35.83% | 25.72% | 45.11% | 6.33% |
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 23.09% | 16.05% | 9.72% | 27.29% | -15.94% | 28.29% | 29.00% | 3.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGM and TDV is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2019 | 0.85 |
The correlation between IGM and TDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
IGM vs. TDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGM
TDV
Technology
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IGM
TDV
Communication Services
IGM
TDV
-
Financial Services
IGM
TDV
Industrials
IGM
TDV
Energy
IGM
TDV
-
Consumer Cyclical
IGM
TDV
-
Basic Materials
IGM
-
TDV
-
Consumer Defensive
IGM
-
TDV
-
Healthcare
IGM
-
TDV
-
Real Estate
IGM
-
TDV
-
Utilities
IGM
-
TDV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGM vs. TDV — Risk / Return Rank
IGM
TDV
IGM vs. TDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGM | TDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.36 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.81 | 3.79 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.36 | 13.11 | +0.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGM | TDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.07 | 2.10 | +0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.69 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.76 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
IGM vs. TDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGM drawdown since its inception was -65.59%, which is greater than TDV's maximum drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGM and TDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGM | TDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.59% | -32.78% | -32.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.44% | -9.55% | -6.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.39% | -22.51% | -3.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.68% | -25.11% | -15.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -0.42% | -0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.23% | -5.36% | -9.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.67% | 2.76% | +1.91% |
Volatility
IGM vs. TDV - Volatility Comparison
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) has a higher volatility of 6.10% compared to ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV) at 5.07%. This indicates that IGM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGM | TDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 5.07% | +1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.08% | 12.72% | +3.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.43% | 17.29% | +3.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.68% | 20.45% | +5.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.54% | 23.20% | +1.34% |
IGM vs. TDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than TDV's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGM vs. TDV - Dividend Comparison
IGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than TDV's 0.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0.12% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.66% | 0.16% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.90% | 0.79% |
TDV ProShares S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 0.93% | 1.09% | 1.16% | 1.16% | 1.67% | 1.08% | 1.10% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGM and TDV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGM has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to TDV (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGM dropped -65.59% vs TDV's -32.78%.
On 5-year performance, IGM leads with 22.04% vs 13.94% for TDV. On fees, IGM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, TDV has been the lower-risk option at 5.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IGM has performed better with a 22.04% return vs 13.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for TDV.
TDV has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.12% for IGM.
IGM tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index, while TDV tracks Zacks 2040 Lifecycle Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGM and 0.66% for TDV.
IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGM and TDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer