IGM vs. SPXL
IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) and SPXL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index, while SPXL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGM returned 24.72%/yr vs 29.92%/yr for SPXL. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IGM charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for SPXL.
Performance
IGM vs. SPXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGM achieves a 23.93% return, which is significantly higher than SPXL's 20.38% return. Over the past 10 years, IGM has underperformed SPXL with an annualized return of 24.72%, while SPXL has yielded a comparatively higher 29.92% annualized return.
IGM
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 23.93%
- 6M
- 27.90%
- 1Y
- 49.62%
- 3Y*
- 35.04%
- 5Y*
- 20.05%
- 10Y*
- 24.72%
SPXL
- 1D
- -3.76%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- YTD
- 20.38%
- 6M
- 26.72%
- 1Y
- 70.31%
- 3Y*
- 45.50%
- 5Y*
- 23.10%
- 10Y*
- 29.92%
IGM vs. SPXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 23.93% | 26.76% | 36.99% | 60.68% | -35.83% | 25.72% | 45.11% | 41.81% | 2.26% | 37.20% |
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 20.38% | 31.94% | 63.61% | 69.49% | -56.55% | 98.75% | 9.64% | 102.80% | -25.11% | 71.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGM and SPXL is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2008 | 0.89 |
The correlation between IGM and SPXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
IGM vs. SPXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGM
SPXL
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
IGM
SPXL
Communication Services
IGM
SPXL
Industrials
IGM
SPXL
Financial Services
IGM
SPXL
Energy
IGM
SPXL
Consumer Cyclical
IGM
SPXL
Basic Materials
IGM
-
SPXL
Consumer Defensive
IGM
-
SPXL
Healthcare
IGM
-
SPXL
Real Estate
IGM
-
SPXL
Utilities
IGM
-
SPXL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGM vs. SPXL — Risk / Return Rank
IGM
SPXL
IGM vs. SPXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGM | SPXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.32 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | 2.64 | +0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.21 | 10.84 | -0.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGM vs. SPXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGM drawdown since its inception was -65.59%, smaller than the maximum SPXL drawdown of -76.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGM and SPXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGM | SPXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.59% | -76.86% | +11.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.44% | -26.77% | +10.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.39% | -48.95% | +22.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.68% | -63.80% | +23.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.68% | -76.86% | +36.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.42% | -8.01% | +1.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.21% | -16.10% | +0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.88% | 6.50% | -1.62% |
Volatility
IGM vs. SPXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) is 10.71%, while Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) has a volatility of 14.13%. This indicates that IGM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGM | SPXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.71% | 14.13% | -3.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.29% | 29.34% | -11.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.31% | 37.14% | -14.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.98% | 50.54% | -24.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.70% | 53.55% | -28.85% |
IGM vs. SPXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than SPXL's 0.84% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGM vs. SPXL - Dividend Comparison
IGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than SPXL's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.66% | 0.16% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.90% | 0.79% |
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 0.56% | 0.69% | 0.74% | 0.98% | 0.32% | 0.11% | 0.22% | 0.84% | 1.02% | 3.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGM and SPXL have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPXL has higher volatility (14.13%) compared to IGM (10.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGM dropped -65.59% vs SPXL's -76.86%.
On 10-year performance, SPXL leads with 29.92% vs 24.72% for IGM. On fees, IGM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IGM has been the lower-risk option at 10.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPXL has performed better with a 29.92% return vs 24.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for SPXL.
SPXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.14% for IGM.
IGM is categorized as Technology Equities, while SPXL is Leveraged Equities. IGM tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index, while SPXL tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGM and 0.84% for SPXL.
IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGM and SPXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer