IGM vs. ACIW
IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Technology Sector Index, while ACIW (ACI Worldwide, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, IGM returned 25.19%/yr vs 7.10%/yr for ACIW. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
IGM vs. ACIW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGM achieves a 31.32% return, which is significantly higher than ACIW's -13.07% return. Over the past 10 years, IGM has outperformed ACIW with an annualized return of 25.19%, while ACIW has yielded a comparatively lower 7.10% annualized return.
IGM
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 16.93%
- YTD
- 31.32%
- 6M
- 29.19%
- 1Y
- 62.26%
- 3Y*
- 39.18%
- 5Y*
- 22.04%
- 10Y*
- 25.19%
ACIW
- 1D
- -4.92%
- 1M
- -6.14%
- YTD
- -13.07%
- 6M
- -11.72%
- 1Y
- -11.18%
- 3Y*
- 20.61%
- 5Y*
- 1.21%
- 10Y*
- 7.10%
IGM vs. ACIW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 31.32% | 26.76% | 36.99% | 60.68% | -35.83% | 25.72% | 45.11% | 41.81% | 2.26% | 37.20% |
ACIW ACI Worldwide, Inc. | -13.07% | -7.90% | 69.64% | 33.04% | -33.72% | -9.71% | 1.43% | 36.94% | 22.06% | 24.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGM and ACIW is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2001 | 0.53 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IGM and ACIW has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGM vs. ACIW — Risk / Return Rank
IGM
ACIW
IGM vs. ACIW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and ACI Worldwide, Inc. (ACIW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGM | ACIW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 0.97 | +0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.81 | -0.40 | +4.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.36 | -0.74 | +14.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGM | ACIW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.07 | -0.34 | +3.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.03 | +0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.03 | 0.20 | +0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.18 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
IGM vs. ACIW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGM drawdown since its inception was -65.59%, smaller than the maximum ACIW drawdown of -90.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGM and ACIW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGM | ACIW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.59% | -90.10% | +24.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.44% | -28.25% | +11.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.39% | -35.02% | +8.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.68% | -49.80% | +9.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.68% | -54.18% | +13.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -29.80% | +28.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.23% | -33.87% | +18.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.67% | 15.04% | -10.37% |
Volatility
IGM vs. ACIW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) is 6.10%, while ACI Worldwide, Inc. (ACIW) has a volatility of 14.40%. This indicates that IGM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACIW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGM | ACIW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 14.40% | -8.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.08% | 26.90% | -10.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.43% | 32.63% | -12.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.68% | 35.18% | -9.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.54% | 35.67% | -11.13% |
Dividends
IGM vs. ACIW - Dividend Comparison
IGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, while ACIW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACIW ACI Worldwide, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0.12% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.66% | 0.16% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.90% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGM and ACIW have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACIW has higher volatility (14.40%) compared to IGM (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGM dropped -65.59% vs ACIW's -90.10%.
IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGM and ACIW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer