PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGLO.L vs. VT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGLO.L vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Government Bond UCITS (IGLO.L) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGLO.L achieves a -4.37% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 11.35% return. Over the past 10 years, IGLO.L has underperformed VT with an annualized return of -1.12%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.38% annualized return.


IGLO.L

1D
-0.24%
1M
-0.85%
6M
-1.84%
YTD
-4.37%
1Y
-3.33%
3Y*
0.28%
5Y*
-3.98%
10Y*
-1.12%
ALL TIME*
0.23%

VT

1D
1.20%
1M
-0.96%
6M
10.26%
YTD
11.35%
1Y
22.04%
3Y*
18.59%
5Y*
10.69%
10Y*
12.38%
ALL TIME*
8.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGLO.L vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGLO.L
iShares Global Government Bond UCITS
-4.37%7.14%-3.65%4.00%-17.69%-6.89%9.37%5.54%-0.30%6.12%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
11.35%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%16.59%26.81%-9.76%24.50%

Correlation

The correlation between IGLO.L and VT is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2009

0.03

Over the past year, IGLO.L and VT have become more correlated (0.28) than their long-term average of 0.03, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGLO.L vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGLO.L
IGLO.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
IGLO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGLO.L vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Government Bond UCITS (IGLO.L) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IGLO.LVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.29

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.67

2.29

-2.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.32

9.67

-11.00

IGLO.L vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGLO.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.55, which is lower than the VT Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGLO.L and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IGLO.L vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGLO.L drawdown since its inception was -28.01%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLO.L and VT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGLO.LVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.01%

-50.27%

+22.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.97%

-9.67%

+4.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.93%

-16.51%

+8.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.88%

-26.38%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.01%

-34.24%

+6.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.34%

-1.66%

-19.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.13%

-6.98%

-2.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

2.28%

+0.23%

Volatility

IGLO.L vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Government Bond UCITS (IGLO.L) is 1.43%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 3.90%. This indicates that IGLO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGLO.LVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.43%

3.90%

-2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.39%

11.59%

-7.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.07%

13.75%

-7.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.53%

16.19%

-8.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.69%

17.17%

-10.48%

IGLO.L vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGLO.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IGLO.L vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

IGLO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, more than VT's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGLO.L
iShares Global Government Bond UCITS
1.62%2.86%2.51%1.47%0.78%0.63%0.99%1.21%1.07%0.93%1.09%0.60%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.59%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGLO.L and VT have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IGLO.L.

IGLO.L is categorized as Global Bonds, while VT is Global Equities. IGLO.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IGLO.L and 0.06% for VT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGLO.L and VT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer