IGLN.L vs. XDW0.DE
IGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) and XDW0.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - IGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price, while XDW0.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGLN.L returned 12.45%/yr vs 9.51%/yr for XDW0.DE. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IGLN.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDW0.DE.
Performance
IGLN.L vs. XDW0.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IGLN.L is traded in USD, while XDW0.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XDW0.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGLN.L achieves a -2.16% return, which is significantly lower than XDW0.DE's 29.08% return. Over the past 10 years, IGLN.L has outperformed XDW0.DE with an annualized return of 12.45%, while XDW0.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.51% annualized return.
IGLN.L
- 1D
- 3.37%
- 1M
- -10.03%
- YTD
- -2.16%
- 6M
- -1.54%
- 1Y
- 23.07%
- 3Y*
- 29.33%
- 5Y*
- 17.43%
- 10Y*
- 12.45%
XDW0.DE
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- -0.56%
- YTD
- 29.08%
- 6M
- 29.05%
- 1Y
- 36.92%
- 3Y*
- 17.21%
- 5Y*
- 18.52%
- 10Y*
- 9.51%
IGLN.L vs. XDW0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | -2.16% | 64.93% | 26.14% | 13.44% | -0.09% | -4.03% | 24.16% | 18.30% | -1.33% | 11.69% |
XDW0.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C | 29.08% | 15.42% | 1.33% | 3.35% | 45.47% | 40.21% | -30.83% | 11.64% | -16.27% | 5.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGLN.L and XDW0.DE is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2011 | 0.09 |
The correlation between IGLN.L and XDW0.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.14 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGLN.L vs. XDW0.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IGLN.L
XDW0.DE
IGLN.L vs. XDW0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGLN.L | XDW0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.32 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | 3.01 | -1.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.27 | 9.81 | -6.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGLN.L vs. XDW0.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGLN.L drawdown since its inception was -45.25%, smaller than the maximum XDW0.DE drawdown of -75.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLN.L and XDW0.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGLN.L | XDW0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.25% | -75.05% | +29.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.02% | -12.81% | -10.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.02% | -19.69% | -3.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.02% | -26.53% | +3.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.02% | -63.77% | +40.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.43% | -7.68% | -12.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.72% | -33.01% | +13.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.41% | 3.93% | +3.48% |
Volatility
IGLN.L vs. XDW0.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) has a higher volatility of 7.69% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) at 6.57%. This indicates that IGLN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDW0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGLN.L | XDW0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.69% | 6.57% | +1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.45% | 18.47% | +3.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.45% | 21.19% | +4.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.55% | 24.53% | -6.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.63% | 26.89% | -11.26% |
IGLN.L vs. XDW0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGLN.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XDW0.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IGLN.L vs. XDW0.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IGLN.L nor XDW0.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IGLN.L and XDW0.DE have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IGLN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IGLN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDW0.DE.
IGLN.L is categorized as Gold, while XDW0.DE is Energy Equities. IGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price, while XDW0.DE tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for IGLN.L and 0.25% for XDW0.DE.
Find the right allocation for IGLN.L and XDW0.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer