PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGLN.L vs. WENS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGLN.L vs. WENS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) and iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IGLN.L is traded in USD, while WENS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the WENS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGLN.L achieves a 3.70% return, which is significantly lower than WENS.L's 31.06% return.


IGLN.L

1D
0.68%
1M
-2.35%
YTD
3.70%
6M
6.03%
1Y
32.37%
3Y*
31.55%
5Y*
18.61%
10Y*
13.42%

WENS.L

1D
-0.38%
1M
-1.47%
YTD
31.06%
6M
27.61%
1Y
42.63%
3Y*
16.80%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGLN.L vs. WENS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
3.70%64.92%26.14%13.44%0.58%
WENS.L
iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
31.06%11.03%0.39%3.17%16.86%

Correlation

The correlation between IGLN.L and WENS.L is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2022

0.13

The correlation between IGLN.L and WENS.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGLN.L vs. WENS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGLN.L
IGLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
IGLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

WENS.L
WENS.L Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
WENS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WENS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
WENS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
WENS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
WENS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGLN.L vs. WENS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) and iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGLN.LWENS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.36

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

3.39

-1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.79

11.47

-6.68

IGLN.L vs. WENS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGLN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the WENS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGLN.L and WENS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGLN.LWENS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

2.06

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.69

-0.24

Drawdowns

IGLN.L vs. WENS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGLN.L drawdown since its inception was -45.24%, which is greater than WENS.L's maximum drawdown of -20.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLN.L and WENS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGLN.LWENS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.24%

-20.04%

-25.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.36%

-12.53%

-4.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.36%

-20.04%

+2.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.66%

-5.96%

-9.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.80%

-5.44%

-14.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.74%

3.71%

+3.03%

Volatility

IGLN.L vs. WENS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) is 6.36%, while iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L) has a volatility of 7.63%. This indicates that IGLN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WENS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGLN.LWENS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.36%

7.63%

-1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.73%

17.84%

+3.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.78%

20.64%

+4.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.36%

22.39%

-5.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.54%

22.39%

-6.85%

IGLN.L vs. WENS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IGLN.L and WENS.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IGLN.L vs. WENS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IGLN.L nor WENS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
IGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WENS.L
iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.00%0.00%1.75%3.61%1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGLN.L and WENS.L have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IGLN.L and WENS.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

IGLN.L is categorized as Gold, while WENS.L is Energy Equities. IGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price, while WENS.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGLN.L and WENS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer