PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGLN.L vs. EYED.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGLN.L vs. EYED.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EYED.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IGLN.L is traded in USD, while EYED.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the EYED.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGLN.L achieves a -6.72% return, which is significantly lower than EYED.L's 18.34% return.


IGLN.L

1D
0.35%
1M
-10.73%
YTD
-6.72%
6M
-10.54%
1Y
20.86%
3Y*
27.64%
5Y*
17.56%
10Y*
11.57%

EYED.L

1D
-0.16%
1M
-11.19%
YTD
18.34%
6M
19.23%
1Y
33.11%
3Y*
15.41%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGLN.L vs. EYED.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
-6.72%64.93%26.14%13.44%6.19%
EYED.L
iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
18.34%29.28%-11.58%11.62%14.83%

Correlation

The correlation between IGLN.L and EYED.L is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2022

0.16

The correlation between IGLN.L and EYED.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.17 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGLN.L vs. EYED.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGLN.L
IGLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
IGLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

EYED.L
EYED.L Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
EYED.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EYED.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
EYED.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
EYED.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
EYED.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGLN.L vs. EYED.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EYED.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IGLN.LEYED.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.25

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

1.93

-1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.48

7.79

-5.31

IGLN.L vs. EYED.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGLN.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the EYED.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGLN.L and EYED.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IGLN.L vs. EYED.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGLN.L drawdown since its inception was -45.25%, which is greater than EYED.L's maximum drawdown of -23.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLN.L and EYED.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGLN.LEYED.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.25%

-23.07%

-22.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.39%

-17.04%

-7.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.39%

-23.07%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.13%

-17.04%

-7.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.72%

-5.59%

-14.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.38%

4.24%

+4.14%

Volatility

IGLN.L vs. EYED.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Physical Gold ETC (IGLN.L) has a higher volatility of 9.08% compared to iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EYED.L) at 8.37%. This indicates that IGLN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EYED.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGLN.LEYED.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.08%

8.37%

+0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.04%

20.25%

+2.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.95%

22.95%

+3.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.63%

22.37%

-4.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.67%

22.37%

-6.70%

IGLN.L vs. EYED.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGLN.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than EYED.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IGLN.L vs. EYED.L - Dividend Comparison

IGLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EYED.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%.


PositionTTM202520242023
EYED.L
iShares MSCI Europe Energy Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
4.31%5.09%5.79%5.09%
IGLN.L
iShares Physical Gold ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGLN.L and EYED.L have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IGLN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IGLN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for EYED.L.

IGLN.L is categorized as Gold, while EYED.L is Energy Equities. IGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price, while EYED.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for IGLN.L and 0.18% for EYED.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGLN.L and EYED.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer