IGLGX vs. YFSNX
IGLGX (Columbia Select Global Equity Fund) and YFSNX (AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, IGLGX returned 10.35%/yr vs 8.52%/yr for YFSNX. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IGLGX charges 1.25%/yr vs 1.11%/yr for YFSNX.
Performance
IGLGX vs. YFSNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGLGX achieves a 20.13% return, which is significantly lower than YFSNX's 24.04% return.
IGLGX
- 1D
- 2.13%
- 1M
- 6.64%
- YTD
- 20.13%
- 6M
- 20.74%
- 1Y
- 34.51%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 10.35%
- 10Y*
- 14.70%
YFSNX
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 24.04%
- 6M
- 27.19%
- 1Y
- 23.43%
- 3Y*
- 15.61%
- 5Y*
- 8.52%
- 10Y*
- —
IGLGX vs. YFSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGLGX Columbia Select Global Equity Fund | 20.13% | 17.39% | 17.49% | 24.47% | -28.14% | 23.11% | 26.62% | 34.96% | -1.70% | 26.17% |
YFSNX AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N | 24.04% | 14.79% | -0.47% | 16.48% | -9.39% | 13.00% | 18.32% | 24.48% | 2.18% | 20.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGLGX and YFSNX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017 | 0.67 |
The correlation between IGLGX and YFSNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGLGX vs. YFSNX — Risk / Return Rank
IGLGX
YFSNX
IGLGX vs. YFSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Global Equity Fund (IGLGX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGLGX | YFSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.27 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 1.69 | +0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.18 | 5.24 | +5.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGLGX vs. YFSNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGLGX drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, which is greater than YFSNX's maximum drawdown of -35.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLGX and YFSNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGLGX | YFSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.11% | -35.14% | -24.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.75% | -14.09% | +1.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.67% | -14.29% | -4.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.73% | -25.26% | -10.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.19% | +3.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.61% | -4.93% | -9.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 4.50% | -1.48% |
Volatility
IGLGX vs. YFSNX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Select Global Equity Fund (IGLGX) has a higher volatility of 7.77% compared to AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX) at 6.52%. This indicates that IGLGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YFSNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGLGX | YFSNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.77% | 6.52% | +1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.57% | 21.26% | -5.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.80% | 21.73% | -3.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.89% | 15.52% | +3.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.75% | 16.29% | +2.46% |
IGLGX vs. YFSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGLGX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than YFSNX's 1.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGLGX vs. YFSNX - Dividend Comparison
IGLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.71%, while YFSNX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGLGX Columbia Select Global Equity Fund | 7.71% | 9.26% | 6.61% | 4.42% | 0.00% | 9.10% | 8.52% | 2.98% | 11.20% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
YFSNX AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.40% | 7.86% | 4.33% | 8.06% | 4.71% | 6.59% | 0.71% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGLGX and YFSNX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGLGX has higher volatility (7.77%) compared to YFSNX (6.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGLGX dropped -60.11% vs YFSNX's -35.14%.
IGLGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGLGX and YFSNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer