PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGLD vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGLD vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGLD achieves a 1.69% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 7.17% return.


IGLD

1D
-0.81%
1M
-1.33%
YTD
1.69%
6M
4.44%
1Y
24.53%
3Y*
23.01%
5Y*
13.02%
10Y*

YCS

1D
0.17%
1M
4.42%
YTD
7.17%
6M
10.05%
1Y
32.82%
3Y*
19.84%
5Y*
23.54%
10Y*
12.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGLD vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IGLD
FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF
1.69%47.46%19.36%9.24%-2.34%4.30%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
7.17%9.04%35.41%28.70%29.09%14.24%

Correlation

The correlation between IGLD and YCS is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2021

-0.34

The correlation between IGLD and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.34 (all time) to -0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGLD vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGLD
IGLD Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
IGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGLD vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGLDYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.35

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

3.97

-2.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.82

12.40

-8.57

IGLD vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGLD and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGLDYCSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

1.92

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

1.12

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.33

+0.61

Drawdowns

IGLD vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGLD drawdown since its inception was -18.59%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLD and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGLDYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.59%

-49.56%

+30.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.56%

-8.30%

-9.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.56%

-23.05%

+5.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.59%

-27.32%

+8.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.16%

0.00%

-15.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.24%

-19.93%

+14.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.43%

2.66%

+3.77%

Volatility

IGLD vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) has a higher volatility of 5.12% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.75%. This indicates that IGLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGLDYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.12%

2.75%

+2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.01%

12.32%

+8.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.24%

17.27%

+5.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.17%

21.10%

-5.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.00%

19.01%

-4.01%

IGLD vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGLD has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGLD vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

IGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.92%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
IGLD
FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF
17.92%9.91%20.81%7.85%4.45%2.24%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGLD and YCS have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGLD has higher volatility (5.12%) compared to YCS (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGLD dropped -18.59% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 5-year performance, YCS leads with 23.54% vs 13.02% for IGLD. On fees, IGLD is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, YCS has performed better with a 23.54% return vs 13.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGLD is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

IGLD has the higher dividend yield at 17.92%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

IGLD is categorized as Precious Metals, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IGLD and 1.00% for YCS.

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGLD and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer