PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGLD.DE vs. IB01.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGLD.DE vs. IB01.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (IGLD.DE) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IGLD.DE is traded in EUR, while IB01.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IB01.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGLD.DE achieves a -9.48% return, which is significantly lower than IB01.L's 4.58% return.


IGLD.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-6.58%
6M
-13.48%
YTD
-9.48%
1Y
16.23%
3Y*
24.33%
5Y*
10Y*

IB01.L

1D
0.22%
1M
1.75%
6M
3.26%
YTD
4.58%
1Y
5.70%
3Y*
4.04%
5Y*
3.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGLD.DE vs. IB01.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IGLD.DE
iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC
-9.48%63.04%24.54%10.49%-0.31%
IB01.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
4.58%-8.05%12.19%1.78%-1.45%

Correlation

The correlation between IGLD.DE and IB01.L is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2022

-0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGLD.DE vs. IB01.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGLD.DE
IGLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
IGLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

IB01.L
IB01.L Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
IB01.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IB01.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
IB01.L Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
IB01.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
IB01.L Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGLD.DE vs. IB01.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (IGLD.DE) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IGLD.DEIB01.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.17

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

1.48

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.55

3.81

-2.26

IGLD.DE vs. IB01.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGLD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the IB01.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGLD.DE and IB01.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IGLD.DE vs. IB01.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.14%, which is greater than IB01.L's maximum drawdown of -13.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLD.DE and IB01.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGLD.DEIB01.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.14%

-13.53%

-11.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.14%

-3.83%

-21.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.14%

-11.53%

-13.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.44%

-4.99%

-19.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.30%

-5.97%

+1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.46%

1.49%

+8.97%

Volatility

IGLD.DE vs. IB01.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (IGLD.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.38% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L) at 1.18%. This indicates that IGLD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IB01.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGLD.DEIB01.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.38%

1.18%

+6.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.04%

4.42%

+18.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.39%

6.13%

+20.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.33%

7.57%

+10.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

7.34%

+10.99%

IGLD.DE vs. IB01.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGLD.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IB01.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IGLD.DE vs. IB01.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IGLD.DE nor IB01.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IGLD.DE and IB01.L have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IB01.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IB01.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IGLD.DE.

IGLD.DE is categorized as Gold, while IB01.L is Government Bonds. IGLD.DE tracks Gold (EUR Hedged), while IB01.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IGLD.DE and 0.07% for IB01.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGLD.DE and IB01.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer