PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGLD.DE vs. 4GLD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGLD.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (IGLD.DE) and Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGLD.DE achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than 4GLD.DE's 2.80% return.


IGLD.DE

1D
0.70%
1M
-2.47%
YTD
0.35%
6M
4.61%
1Y
28.86%
3Y*
28.49%
5Y*
10Y*

4GLD.DE

1D
0.57%
1M
-1.56%
YTD
2.80%
6M
6.42%
1Y
30.27%
3Y*
28.18%
5Y*
19.85%
10Y*
13.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGLD.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IGLD.DE
iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC
0.35%63.04%24.54%10.49%2.47%
4GLD.DE
Xetra-Gold
2.80%49.32%34.57%9.32%-0.61%

Correlation

The correlation between IGLD.DE and 4GLD.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2022

0.86

The correlation between IGLD.DE and 4GLD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGLD.DE vs. 4GLD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGLD.DE
IGLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
IGLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

4GLD.DE
4GLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
4GLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
4GLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGLD.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (IGLD.DE) and Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGLD.DE4GLD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.26

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

1.82

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.10

4.63

-0.53

IGLD.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGLD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is comparable to the 4GLD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGLD.DE and 4GLD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGLD.DE4GLD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

1.31

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.32

0.65

+0.67

Drawdowns

IGLD.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.62%, smaller than the maximum 4GLD.DE drawdown of -36.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLD.DE and 4GLD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGLD.DE4GLD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.62%

-36.79%

+19.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.62%

-16.54%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.62%

-16.54%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.24%

-14.95%

-1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-11.83%

+8.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.03%

6.52%

+0.51%

Volatility

IGLD.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (IGLD.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to Xetra-Gold (4GLD.DE) at 5.09%. This indicates that IGLD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 4GLD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGLD.DE4GLD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.98%

5.09%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.79%

20.09%

+1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.80%

23.06%

+1.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.86%

16.00%

+1.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.86%

14.37%

+3.49%

IGLD.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGLD.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than 4GLD.DE's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IGLD.DE vs. 4GLD.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IGLD.DE nor 4GLD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, IGLD.DE and 4GLD.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, 4GLD.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

4GLD.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IGLD.DE.

IGLD.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while 4GLD.DE is Gold. IGLD.DE tracks Gold (EUR Hedged), while 4GLD.DE tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Deutsche Börse Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IGLD.DE and 0.00% for 4GLD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGLD.DE and 4GLD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer