PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGLB vs. FLOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IGLB vs. FLOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGLB) and iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IGLB vs. FLOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGLB
iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
-0.77%7.53%-1.50%11.03%-25.38%-1.68%13.30%23.19%-6.90%12.15%
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
0.84%4.91%6.53%6.43%1.28%0.45%0.87%3.97%1.48%1.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGLB achieves a -0.77% return, which is significantly lower than FLOT's 0.84% return. Over the past 10 years, IGLB has underperformed FLOT with an annualized return of 2.45%, while FLOT has yielded a comparatively higher 2.98% annualized return.


IGLB

1D
0.73%
1M
-3.01%
YTD
-0.77%
6M
-1.22%
1Y
4.05%
3Y*
3.25%
5Y*
-1.62%
10Y*
2.45%

FLOT

1D
0.24%
1M
0.22%
YTD
0.84%
6M
2.01%
1Y
4.63%
3Y*
5.91%
5Y*
4.03%
10Y*
2.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IGLB vs. FLOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGLB has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than FLOT's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

IGLB vs. FLOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGLB
IGLB Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
IGLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLB Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLB Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

FLOT
FLOT Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FLOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOT Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOT Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGLB vs. FLOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGLB) and iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGLBFLOTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.41

2.20

-1.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.61

2.75

-2.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

2.01

-0.93

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

2.95

-2.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.97

22.96

-20.99

IGLB vs. FLOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGLB Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the FLOT Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGLB and FLOT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGLBFLOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

2.20

-1.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

2.29

-2.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

0.72

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.65

-0.27

Correlation

The correlation between IGLB and FLOT is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

IGLB vs. FLOT - Dividend Comparison

IGLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.25%, more than FLOT's 4.72% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGLB
iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
5.25%5.14%5.10%4.59%4.56%3.16%3.22%3.73%4.56%3.94%4.21%4.58%
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
4.72%4.84%5.82%5.66%2.06%0.43%1.25%2.78%2.41%1.46%0.97%0.53%

Drawdowns

IGLB vs. FLOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGLB drawdown since its inception was -34.12%, which is greater than FLOT's maximum drawdown of -13.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLB and FLOT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IGLBFLOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.12%

-13.54%

-20.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.41%

-1.57%

-3.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.12%

-2.36%

-31.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.12%

-13.54%

-20.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.08%

-0.06%

-15.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.04%

-0.21%

-7.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

0.20%

+2.07%

Volatility

IGLB vs. FLOT - Volatility Comparison

iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGLB) has a higher volatility of 3.94% compared to iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) at 0.49%. This indicates that IGLB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IGLBFLOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.94%

0.49%

+3.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.53%

0.59%

+4.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.95%

2.12%

+7.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.42%

1.77%

+10.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.53%

4.15%

+8.38%