PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGLB vs. BSJS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGLB vs. BSJS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGLB) and Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGLB achieves a 0.84% return, which is significantly lower than BSJS's 1.67% return.


IGLB

1D
-0.32%
1M
1.42%
YTD
0.84%
6M
-0.11%
1Y
7.79%
3Y*
4.53%
5Y*
-1.66%
10Y*
2.28%

BSJS

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.61%
YTD
1.67%
6M
2.13%
1Y
6.48%
3Y*
8.32%
5Y*
3.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGLB vs. BSJS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IGLB
iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
0.84%7.53%-1.50%11.03%-25.38%-1.68%3.64%
BSJS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.67%8.31%7.38%12.28%-13.69%3.40%4.05%

Correlation

The correlation between IGLB and BSJS is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2020

0.52

The correlation between IGLB and BSJS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGLB vs. BSJS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGLB
IGLB Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
IGLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLB Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLB Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

BSJS
BSJS Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
BSJS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSJS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSJS Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
BSJS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSJS Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGLB vs. BSJS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGLB) and Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGLBBSJSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.45

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

3.97

-2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.79

19.33

-15.54

IGLB vs. BSJS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGLB Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the BSJS Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGLB and BSJS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGLBBSJSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

2.29

-1.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

0.45

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.52

-0.15

Drawdowns

IGLB vs. BSJS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGLB drawdown since its inception was -34.12%, which is greater than BSJS's maximum drawdown of -17.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLB and BSJS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGLBBSJSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.12%

-17.73%

-16.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.19%

-1.64%

-3.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.87%

-4.44%

-8.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.12%

-17.73%

-16.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.70%

-0.05%

-13.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.11%

-3.99%

-4.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

0.34%

+1.72%

Volatility

IGLB vs. BSJS - Volatility Comparison

iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGLB) has a higher volatility of 2.32% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) at 0.72%. This indicates that IGLB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSJS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGLBBSJSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.32%

0.72%

+1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.70%

2.03%

+3.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.84%

2.84%

+5.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.39%

7.39%

+5.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.53%

7.14%

+5.39%

IGLB vs. BSJS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGLB has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than BSJS's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGLB vs. BSJS - Dividend Comparison

IGLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.26%, less than BSJS's 6.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSJS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.27%6.49%7.04%6.75%5.82%4.86%0.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IGLB
iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
5.26%5.14%5.10%4.59%4.56%3.16%3.22%3.73%4.56%3.94%4.21%4.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGLB and BSJS have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGLB has higher volatility (2.32%) compared to BSJS (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGLB dropped -34.12% vs BSJS's -17.73%.

On 5-year performance, BSJS leads with 3.29% vs -1.66% for IGLB. On fees, IGLB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, BSJS has been the lower-risk option at 0.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BSJS has performed better with a 3.29% return vs -1.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGLB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJS.

BSJS has the higher dividend yield at 6.27%, compared with 5.26% for IGLB.

IGLB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while BSJS is High Yield Bonds. IGLB tracks ICE BofAML10+ Year US Corporate Index, while BSJS tracks Nasdaq BulletSharesUSD High Yield Corporate Bond 2028 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for IGLB and 0.42% for BSJS.

BSJS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGLB and BSJS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer