IGHG vs. FLDR
IGHG (ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged) and FLDR (Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGHG is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Citi Corporate Investment Grade (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index, while FLDR is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IGHG returned 5.33%/yr vs 3.72%/yr for FLDR. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. IGHG charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FLDR.
Performance
IGHG vs. FLDR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGHG achieves a 1.95% return, which is significantly higher than FLDR's 1.83% return.
IGHG
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 1.95%
- 1Y
- 4.71%
- 3Y*
- 7.85%
- 5Y*
- 5.33%
- 10Y*
- 4.69%
FLDR
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 4.49%
- 3Y*
- 5.28%
- 5Y*
- 3.72%
- 10Y*
- —
IGHG vs. FLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGHG ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged | 1.95% | 5.65% | 9.20% | 11.58% | -0.90% | 0.88% | 0.61% | 12.73% | -2.43% |
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF | 1.83% | 5.41% | 5.71% | 6.32% | -0.33% | -0.18% | 2.01% | 4.52% | 0.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGHG and FLDR is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2018 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGHG vs. FLDR — Risk / Return Rank
IGHG
FLDR
IGHG vs. FLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged (IGHG) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGHG | FLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 2.61 | -1.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 9.65 | -6.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.50 | 65.59 | -56.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGHG vs. FLDR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGHG drawdown since its inception was -25.16%, which is greater than FLDR's maximum drawdown of -12.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGHG and FLDR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGHG | FLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.16% | -12.23% | -12.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.75% | -0.47% | -1.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.74% | -0.76% | -2.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.75% | -2.33% | -6.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -0.03% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.28% | -0.35% | -1.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.50% | 0.07% | +0.43% |
Volatility
IGHG vs. FLDR - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged (IGHG) has a higher volatility of 0.62% compared to Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) at 0.22%. This indicates that IGHG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGHG | FLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.62% | 0.22% | +0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.11% | 0.61% | +1.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.35% | 0.80% | +2.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.01% | 1.21% | +3.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.32% | 5.23% | +2.09% |
IGHG vs. FLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGHG has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FLDR's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGHG vs. FLDR - Dividend Comparison
IGHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, more than FLDR's 4.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF | 4.33% | 4.66% | 5.50% | 5.28% | 2.09% | 0.51% | 1.22% | 2.69% | 1.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IGHG ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged | 5.13% | 5.14% | 5.06% | 4.99% | 3.55% | 2.50% | 2.79% | 3.48% | 4.13% | 3.36% | 3.37% | 3.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGHG and FLDR have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGHG has higher volatility (0.62%) compared to FLDR (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGHG dropped -25.16% vs FLDR's -12.23%.
On 5-year performance, IGHG leads with 5.33% vs 3.72% for FLDR. On fees, FLDR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FLDR has been the lower-risk option at 0.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IGHG has performed better with a 5.33% return vs 3.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLDR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IGHG.
IGHG has the higher dividend yield at 5.13%, compared with 4.33% for FLDR.
IGHG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while FLDR is Short-Term Bond. IGHG tracks Citi Corporate Investment Grade (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index, while FLDR tracks Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IGHG and 0.15% for FLDR.
FLDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.64 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGHG and FLDR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer