IGHG vs. BITO
IGHG (ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged) and BITO (ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGHG is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Citi Corporate Investment Grade (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index, while BITO is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares. IGHG is passively managed, while BITO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IGHG returned 7.85%/yr vs 20.79%/yr for BITO. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IGHG charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BITO.
Performance
IGHG vs. BITO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGHG achieves a 1.95% return, which is significantly higher than BITO's -27.52% return.
IGHG
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 1.95%
- 1Y
- 4.71%
- 3Y*
- 7.85%
- 5Y*
- 5.33%
- 10Y*
- 4.69%
BITO
- 1D
- 3.67%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- 6M
- -32.82%
- YTD
- -27.52%
- 1Y
- -48.25%
- 3Y*
- 20.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGHG vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGHG ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged | 1.95% | 5.65% | 9.20% | 11.58% | -0.90% | -1.12% |
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | -27.52% | -11.19% | 104.45% | 137.33% | -63.91% | -29.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGHG and BITO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2021 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGHG vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank
IGHG
BITO
IGHG vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged (IGHG) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGHG | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 0.81 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | -0.89 | +3.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.50 | -1.44 | +10.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGHG vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGHG drawdown since its inception was -25.16%, smaller than the maximum BITO drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGHG and BITO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGHG | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.16% | -77.86% | +52.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.75% | -54.47% | +52.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.74% | -54.47% | +50.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -50.01% | +49.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.28% | -37.04% | +34.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.50% | 33.62% | -33.12% |
Volatility
IGHG vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged (IGHG) is 0.62%, while ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) has a volatility of 11.44%. This indicates that IGHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGHG | BITO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.62% | 11.44% | -10.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.11% | 34.70% | -32.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.35% | 44.20% | -40.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.01% | 54.84% | -49.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.32% | 54.84% | -47.52% |
IGHG vs. BITO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGHG has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BITO's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGHG vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison
IGHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, less than BITO's 60.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF | 60.04% | 78.29% | 61.59% | 15.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IGHG ProShares Investment Grade-Interest Rate Hedged | 5.13% | 5.14% | 5.06% | 4.99% | 3.55% | 2.50% | 2.79% | 3.48% | 4.13% | 3.36% | 3.37% | 3.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGHG and BITO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BITO has higher volatility (11.44%) compared to IGHG (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGHG dropped -25.16% vs BITO's -77.86%.
On 3-year performance, BITO leads with 20.79% vs 7.85% for IGHG. On fees, IGHG is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, IGHG has been the lower-risk option at 0.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BITO has performed better with a 20.79% return vs 7.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGHG is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BITO.
BITO has the higher dividend yield at 60.04%, compared with 5.13% for IGHG.
IGHG is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while BITO is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IGHG and 0.95% for BITO.
IGHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGHG and BITO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer