PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGFFX vs. GCCHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGFFX vs. GCCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds International Growth and Income Fund Class F-2 (IGFFX) and GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGFFX achieves a 13.75% return, which is significantly lower than GCCHX's 20.11% return.


IGFFX

1D
0.42%
1M
2.16%
YTD
13.75%
6M
13.58%
1Y
30.52%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
9.27%
10Y*
10.54%

GCCHX

1D
0.33%
1M
-1.73%
YTD
20.11%
6M
18.32%
1Y
68.36%
3Y*
4.06%
5Y*
2.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGFFX vs. GCCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGFFX
American Funds International Growth and Income Fund Class F-2
13.75%35.43%3.56%15.57%-15.26%10.11%8.06%27.41%-14.18%16.51%
GCCHX
GMO Climate Change Fund
20.11%39.25%-25.63%-6.85%-10.39%21.84%42.82%27.36%-16.35%26.15%

Correlation

The correlation between IGFFX and GCCHX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2017

0.75

The correlation between IGFFX and GCCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGFFX vs. GCCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGFFX
IGFFX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
IGFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
IGFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

GCCHX
GCCHX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
GCCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
GCCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGFFX vs. GCCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds International Growth and Income Fund Class F-2 (IGFFX) and GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IGFFXGCCHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.45

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

5.81

-2.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.67

17.68

-7.01

IGFFX vs. GCCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGFFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the GCCHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGFFX and GCCHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IGFFX vs. GCCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGFFX drawdown since its inception was -35.76%, smaller than the maximum GCCHX drawdown of -54.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGFFX and GCCHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGFFXGCCHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.76%

-54.32%

+18.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.89%

-11.76%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.59%

-52.03%

+39.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-54.32%

+24.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-6.77%

+6.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.73%

-13.86%

+6.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

3.86%

-0.95%

Volatility

IGFFX vs. GCCHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds International Growth and Income Fund Class F-2 (IGFFX) is 5.37%, while GMO Climate Change Fund (GCCHX) has a volatility of 8.79%. This indicates that IGFFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGFFXGCCHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.37%

8.79%

-3.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.05%

17.71%

-5.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.93%

23.85%

-9.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.75%

27.15%

-12.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.93%

25.20%

-9.27%

IGFFX vs. GCCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGFFX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than GCCHX's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGFFX vs. GCCHX - Dividend Comparison

IGFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.02%, more than GCCHX's 1.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCCHX
GMO Climate Change Fund
1.25%1.51%0.66%0.96%2.24%25.43%5.42%4.03%2.62%3.43%0.00%0.00%
IGFFX
American Funds International Growth and Income Fund Class F-2
7.02%8.38%3.65%2.55%4.28%7.18%1.60%2.62%3.06%2.04%2.59%3.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGFFX and GCCHX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GCCHX has higher volatility (8.79%) compared to IGFFX (5.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGFFX dropped -35.76% vs GCCHX's -54.32%.

GCCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGFFX and GCCHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer