PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGEB vs. DIVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGEB vs. DIVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Investment Grade Bond Factor ETF (IGEB) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGEB achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than DIVO's 5.53% return.


IGEB

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.57%
YTD
0.41%
6M
0.32%
1Y
5.98%
3Y*
5.88%
5Y*
1.10%
10Y*

DIVO

1D
-0.54%
1M
2.34%
YTD
5.53%
6M
5.82%
1Y
18.37%
3Y*
15.35%
5Y*
10.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGEB vs. DIVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGEB
iShares Investment Grade Bond Factor ETF
0.41%8.17%3.10%9.56%-14.85%-1.14%11.23%15.42%-2.05%1.53%
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
5.53%17.40%16.22%6.95%-1.46%22.87%12.40%24.90%-3.18%8.53%

Correlation

The correlation between IGEB and DIVO is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2017

0.18

The correlation between IGEB and DIVO shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGEB vs. DIVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGEB
IGEB Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
IGEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGEB Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
IGEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGEB Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVO
DIVO Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
DIVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGEB vs. DIVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Investment Grade Bond Factor ETF (IGEB) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGEBDIVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.36

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

3.10

-1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.81

11.21

-4.39

IGEB vs. DIVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGEB Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the DIVO Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGEB and DIVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGEBDIVODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

2.06

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.89

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.85

-0.36

Drawdowns

IGEB vs. DIVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGEB drawdown since its inception was -21.13%, smaller than the maximum DIVO drawdown of -30.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGEB and DIVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGEBDIVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.13%

-30.04%

+8.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.88%

-5.95%

+3.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.97%

-12.12%

+6.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.13%

-13.72%

-7.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-0.82%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-2.61%

-2.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

1.64%

-0.76%

Volatility

IGEB vs. DIVO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Investment Grade Bond Factor ETF (IGEB) is 1.33%, while Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) has a volatility of 2.01%. This indicates that IGEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGEBDIVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.33%

2.01%

-0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.07%

6.88%

-3.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.16%

8.97%

-4.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.70%

11.94%

-5.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.52%

14.84%

-8.32%

IGEB vs. DIVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGEB has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than DIVO's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGEB vs. DIVO - Dividend Comparison

IGEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, less than DIVO's 6.42% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
6.42%6.44%4.70%4.67%4.76%4.79%4.91%8.16%5.27%3.83%
IGEB
iShares Investment Grade Bond Factor ETF
5.06%4.92%5.09%4.60%3.64%3.84%3.78%5.61%3.59%1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGEB and DIVO have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIVO has higher volatility (2.01%) compared to IGEB (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGEB dropped -21.13% vs DIVO's -30.04%.

On 5-year performance, DIVO leads with 10.61% vs 1.10% for IGEB. On fees, IGEB is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IGEB has been the lower-risk option at 1.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DIVO has performed better with a 10.61% return vs 1.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGEB is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for DIVO.

DIVO has the higher dividend yield at 6.42%, compared with 5.06% for IGEB.

IGEB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while DIVO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IGEB and 0.56% for DIVO.

DIVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGEB and DIVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer