IGEB vs. GHYB
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Investment Grade Bond Factor ETF (IGEB) and Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (GHYB).
IGEB and GHYB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IGEB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the BlackRock Investment Grade Enhanced Bond Index. It was launched on Jul 11, 2017. GHYB is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the FTSE Goldman Sachs High Yield Corporate Bond Index. It was launched on Sep 5, 2017. Both IGEB and GHYB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IGEB or GHYB.
Key characteristics
IGEB | GHYB | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 4.14% | 8.20% |
1Y Return | 11.74% | 13.92% |
3Y Return (Ann) | -1.28% | 2.68% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 1.72% | 3.91% |
Sharpe Ratio | 2.07 | 2.66 |
Sortino Ratio | 3.11 | 4.01 |
Omega Ratio | 1.37 | 1.53 |
Calmar Ratio | 0.81 | 2.31 |
Martin Ratio | 9.37 | 17.85 |
Ulcer Index | 1.31% | 0.78% |
Daily Std Dev | 5.91% | 5.22% |
Max Drawdown | -21.13% | -21.48% |
Current Drawdown | -4.54% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGEB and GHYB is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
IGEB vs. GHYB - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IGEB achieves a 4.14% return, which is significantly lower than GHYB's 8.20% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IGEB vs. GHYB - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGEB has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than GHYB's 0.34% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IGEB vs. GHYB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Investment Grade Bond Factor ETF (IGEB) and Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (GHYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IGEB vs. GHYB - Dividend Comparison
IGEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.84%, less than GHYB's 6.41% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
iShares Investment Grade Bond Factor ETF | 4.84% | 4.60% | 3.63% | 3.84% | 3.77% | 5.61% | 3.59% | 1.61% |
Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.41% | 6.19% | 5.67% | 4.45% | 4.75% | 5.57% | 5.68% | 1.45% |
Drawdowns
IGEB vs. GHYB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGEB drawdown since its inception was -21.13%, roughly equal to the maximum GHYB drawdown of -21.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGEB and GHYB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IGEB vs. GHYB - Volatility Comparison
iShares Investment Grade Bond Factor ETF (IGEB) has a higher volatility of 1.85% compared to Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (GHYB) at 1.05%. This indicates that IGEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GHYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.