PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGEB vs. BYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGEB vs. BYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Investment Grade Bond Factor ETF (IGEB) and iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF (BYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGEB achieves a -0.29% return, which is significantly lower than BYLD's 0.82% return.


IGEB

1D
0.26%
1M
-1.24%
6M
-0.45%
YTD
-0.29%
1Y
2.28%
3Y*
5.57%
5Y*
0.38%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.02%

BYLD

1D
0.31%
1M
-0.89%
6M
0.18%
YTD
0.82%
1Y
4.04%
3Y*
6.16%
5Y*
1.83%
10Y*
2.80%
ALL TIME*
2.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.07M$1.49M$2.52M
$17.04M$16.29M$13.61M

IGEB vs. BYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGEB
iShares Investment Grade Bond Factor ETF
-0.29%8.17%3.10%9.56%-14.85%-1.14%11.23%15.42%-2.05%1.53%
BYLD
iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF
0.82%8.41%4.17%8.30%-10.33%-1.25%4.25%12.79%-1.50%1.65%

Correlation

The correlation between IGEB and BYLD is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2017

0.79

The correlation between IGEB and BYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.89 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGEB vs. BYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IGEB
IGEB Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
IGEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGEB Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
IGEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGEB Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

BYLD
BYLD Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
BYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
BYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
BYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
BYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IGEB vs. BYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Investment Grade Bond Factor ETF (IGEB) and iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF (BYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IGEBBYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.19

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

1.50

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.28

5.65

-3.36

IGEB vs. BYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGEB Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the BYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGEB and BYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IGEB vs. BYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGEB drawdown since its inception was -21.13%, which is greater than BYLD's maximum drawdown of -14.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGEB and BYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGEBBYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.13%

-14.75%

-6.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.88%

-2.71%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.02%

-3.54%

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.11%

-14.65%

-6.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.72%

-1.06%

-0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.83%

-2.49%

-2.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

0.72%

+0.28%

Volatility

IGEB vs. BYLD - Volatility Comparison

iShares Investment Grade Bond Factor ETF (IGEB) has a higher volatility of 1.08% compared to iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF (BYLD) at 0.92%. This indicates that IGEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGEBBYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.08%

0.92%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.26%

3.10%

+0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.04%

3.80%

+0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.69%

5.21%

+1.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.48%

5.43%

+1.05%

IGEB vs. BYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGEB has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than BYLD's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IGEB vs. BYLD - Dividend Comparison

IGEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, less than BYLD's 5.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BYLD
iShares Yield Optimized Bond ETF
5.41%5.32%5.31%4.45%3.39%2.18%3.41%3.67%4.22%3.22%3.14%3.37%
IGEB
iShares Investment Grade Bond Factor ETF
5.16%4.92%5.09%4.60%3.64%3.84%3.78%5.61%3.59%1.62%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGEB and BYLD have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGEB has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to BYLD (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGEB dropped -21.13% vs BYLD's -14.75%.

On 5-year performance, BYLD leads with 1.83% vs 0.38% for IGEB. On fees, BYLD is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, BYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BYLD has performed better with a 1.83% return vs 0.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BYLD is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IGEB.

BYLD has the higher dividend yield at 5.41%, compared with 5.16% for IGEB.

IGEB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while BYLD is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. IGEB tracks BlackRock Investment Grade Enhanced Bond Index, while BYLD tracks Morningstar U.S. Bond Market Yield-Optimized Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IGEB and 0.17% for BYLD.

BYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGEB and BYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer