IGE vs. HAP

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

IGE (iShares North American Natural Resources ETF) and HAP (VanEck Natural Resources ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - IGE tracks the S&P North American Natural Resources Sector Index while HAP tracks the MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGE returned 9.18%/yr vs 11.28%/yr for HAP. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IGE charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for HAP.

Performance

IGE vs. HAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares North American Natural Resources ETF (IGE) and VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGE achieves a 20.18% return, which is significantly higher than HAP's 17.54% return. Over the past 10 years, IGE has underperformed HAP with an annualized return of 9.18%, while HAP has yielded a comparatively higher 11.28% annualized return.

IGE

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 5.82%
• 6M: 8.49%
• YTD: 20.18%
• 1Y: 37.23%
• 3Y*: 16.00%
• 5Y*: 19.32%
• 10Y*: 9.18%
• ALL TIME*: 7.92%

HAP

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 2.30%
• 6M: 5.27%
• YTD: 17.54%
• 1Y: 38.48%
• 3Y*: 15.28%
• 5Y*: 12.21%
• 10Y*: 11.28%
• ALL TIME*: 5.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF	$2.74M	$3.44M	$2.56M
IGE iShares North American Natural Resources ETF	$9.13M	$6.85M	$9.74M

IGE vs. HAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IGE iShares North American Natural Resources ETF	20.18%	20.41%	7.55%	3.12%	33.24%	39.42%	-19.58%	17.16%	-21.59%	0.82%
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF	17.54%	34.91%	-4.08%	2.46%	7.84%	25.04%	6.30%	18.60%	-10.68%	17.12%

Correlation

The correlation between IGE and HAP is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2008	0.87

The correlation between IGE and HAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

IGE vs. HAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IGE	HAP
Energy	72.3%	28.7%
Basic Materials	23.5%	38.2%
Consumer Cyclical	3.6%	0.2%
Healthcare	0.2%	3.8%
Industrials	0.1%	11.6%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	6.3%
Financial Services	-	-
Real Estate	-	0.4%
Technology	-	1.0%
Utilities	-	9.8%

Return for Risk

IGE vs. HAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IGE

IGE Risk / Return Rank: 84
IGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
IGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
IGE Omega Ratio Rank: 85
IGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
IGE Martin Ratio Rank: 77

HAP

HAP Risk / Return Rank: 90
HAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
HAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
HAP Omega Ratio Rank: 91
HAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
HAP Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IGE vs. HAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares North American Natural Resources ETF (IGE) and VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IGE	HAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.27	2.47	-0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.00	3.20	-0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.44	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.24	4.25	-1.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.98	11.97	-1.99

IGE vs. HAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGE Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the HAP Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGE and HAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IGE vs. HAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGE drawdown since its inception was -67.55%, which is greater than HAP's maximum drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGE and HAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	IGE	HAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.55%	-50.99%	-16.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.54%	-9.09%	-2.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.49%	-16.92%	-2.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.72%	-25.66%	-0.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-60.57%	-44.07%	-16.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.07%	-5.15%	+0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.82%	-12.03%	-6.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.74%	3.22%	+0.52%

Volatility

IGE vs. HAP - Volatility Comparison

iShares North American Natural Resources ETF (IGE) and VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) have volatilities of 3.87% and 3.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IGE	HAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.87%	3.85%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.59%	12.57%	+0.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.54%	15.70%	+0.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.22%	18.21%	+4.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.86%	19.67%	+5.19%

IGE vs. HAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than HAP's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

IGE vs. HAP - Dividend Comparison

IGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than HAP's 1.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF	1.93%	2.27%	2.65%	3.27%	3.28%	2.16%	2.45%	2.80%	2.85%	2.02%	1.99%	3.00%
IGE iShares North American Natural Resources ETF	1.99%	2.32%	2.54%	2.85%	2.96%	2.92%	3.34%	5.55%	2.68%	2.11%	1.66%	3.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IGE and HAP in my portfolio?

IGE and HAP have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IGE or HAP?

IGE has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to HAP (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGE dropped -67.55% vs HAP's -50.99%.

Which ETF is better, IGE or HAP?

On 10-year performance, HAP leads with 11.28% vs 9.18% for IGE. On fees, IGE is cheaper at 0.39% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IGE or HAP?

Over the 10-year period, HAP has performed better with a 11.28% return vs 9.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IGE or HAP?

IGE is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for HAP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IGE or HAP?

IGE has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.93% for HAP.

What is the main difference between IGE and HAP?

IGE tracks S&P North American Natural Resources Sector Index, while HAP tracks MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGE and 0.42% for HAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.