PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGCB vs. IBDS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGCB vs. IBDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Corporate Bond ETF (IGCB) and iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Corporate ETF (IBDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGCB achieves a 0.08% return, which is significantly lower than IBDS's 1.23% return.


IGCB

1D
-0.30%
1M
0.37%
YTD
0.08%
6M
-0.02%
1Y
5.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBDS

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.31%
YTD
1.23%
6M
1.61%
1Y
4.57%
3Y*
5.28%
5Y*
1.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGCB vs. IBDS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IGCB
TCW Corporate Bond ETF
0.08%8.42%-0.39%
IBDS
iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Corporate ETF
1.23%5.86%0.49%

Correlation

The correlation between IGCB and IBDS is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2024

0.58

The correlation between IGCB and IBDS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGCB vs. IBDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGCB
IGCB Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
IGCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGCB Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
IGCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGCB Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

IBDS
IBDS Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
IBDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBDS Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBDS Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGCB vs. IBDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Corporate Bond ETF (IGCB) and iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Corporate ETF (IBDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGCBIBDSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

2.09

-0.84

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

10.55

-8.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.69

48.73

-43.04

IGCB vs. IBDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGCB Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the IBDS Sharpe Ratio of 4.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGCB and IBDS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGCBIBDSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

4.19

-2.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.09

0.57

+0.52

Drawdowns

IGCB vs. IBDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGCB drawdown since its inception was -4.20%, smaller than the maximum IBDS drawdown of -16.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGCB and IBDS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGCBIBDSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.20%

-16.75%

+12.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.91%

-0.43%

-2.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

-0.06%

-1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.93%

-3.36%

+2.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

0.09%

+0.86%

Volatility

IGCB vs. IBDS - Volatility Comparison

TCW Corporate Bond ETF (IGCB) has a higher volatility of 1.35% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Corporate ETF (IBDS) at 0.15%. This indicates that IGCB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGCBIBDSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

0.15%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.78%

0.64%

+2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.92%

1.10%

+2.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.82%

4.18%

+0.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.82%

5.55%

-0.73%

IGCB vs. IBDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGCB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IBDS's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGCB vs. IBDS - Dividend Comparison

IGCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, more than IBDS's 4.32% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBDS
iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Corporate ETF
4.32%4.36%4.37%3.81%2.87%2.19%2.66%3.32%3.66%0.97%
IGCB
TCW Corporate Bond ETF
4.75%4.52%0.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGCB and IBDS have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGCB has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to IBDS (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGCB dropped -4.20% vs IBDS's -16.75%.

On 1-year performance, IGCB leads with 5.37% vs 4.57% for IBDS. On fees, IBDS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBDS has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IGCB has performed better with a 5.37% return vs 4.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBDS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IGCB.

IGCB has the higher dividend yield at 4.75%, compared with 4.32% for IBDS.

IGCB tracks Actively Managed, while IBDS tracks Bloomberg Barclays December 2027 Maturity Corporate Index. They also come from different issuers: TCW and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IGCB and 0.10% for IBDS.

IBDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.19 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGCB and IBDS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer