PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGCB vs. HYBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGCB vs. HYBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Corporate Bond ETF (IGCB) and TCW High Yield Bond ETF (HYBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGCB achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly lower than HYBX's 2.52% return.


IGCB

1D
0.10%
1M
0.69%
YTD
0.26%
6M
0.52%
1Y
4.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HYBX

1D
0.03%
1M
0.15%
YTD
2.52%
6M
1.94%
1Y
5.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGCB vs. HYBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IGCB
TCW Corporate Bond ETF
0.26%8.42%-0.26%
HYBX
TCW High Yield Bond ETF
2.52%6.26%-0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between IGCB and HYBX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2024

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGCB vs. HYBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGCB
IGCB Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
IGCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGCB Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
IGCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGCB Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

HYBX
HYBX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
HYBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
HYBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYBX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGCB vs. HYBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Corporate Bond ETF (IGCB) and TCW High Yield Bond ETF (HYBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IGCBHYBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.15

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

2.42

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.55

7.77

-3.22

IGCB vs. HYBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGCB Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is higher than the HYBX Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGCB and HYBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IGCB vs. HYBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGCB drawdown since its inception was -4.20%, which is greater than HYBX's maximum drawdown of -3.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGCB and HYBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGCBHYBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.20%

-3.93%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.91%

-2.15%

-0.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

-0.59%

-0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.93%

-0.56%

-0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

0.67%

+0.31%

Volatility

IGCB vs. HYBX - Volatility Comparison

TCW Corporate Bond ETF (IGCB) and TCW High Yield Bond ETF (HYBX) have volatilities of 1.07% and 1.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGCBHYBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.07%

1.08%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.80%

4.94%

-2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.86%

6.62%

-2.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.79%

7.57%

-2.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.79%

7.57%

-2.78%

IGCB vs. HYBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGCB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than HYBX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGCB vs. HYBX - Dividend Comparison

IGCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%, less than HYBX's 7.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
HYBX
TCW High Yield Bond ETF
7.71%7.82%1.08%
IGCB
TCW Corporate Bond ETF
4.74%4.52%0.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGCB and HYBX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYBX has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to IGCB (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGCB dropped -4.20% vs HYBX's -3.93%.

On 1-year performance, HYBX leads with 5.19% vs 4.47% for IGCB. On fees, IGCB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HYBX has performed better with a 5.19% return vs 4.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGCB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HYBX.

HYBX has the higher dividend yield at 7.71%, compared with 4.74% for IGCB.

IGCB is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while HYBX is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for IGCB and 0.50% for HYBX.

IGCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGCB and HYBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer