PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IG vs. QCON
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IG vs. QCON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF (IG) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IG

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.55%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QCON

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IG vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison


IG vs. QCON - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IG
QCON

Financial Services

2.9%
7.9%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

1.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

1.5%

Financial Services

IG
2.9%
QCON
7.9%

Basic Materials

IG

-

QCON

-

Communication Services

IG

-

QCON

-

Consumer Cyclical

IG

-

QCON

-

Consumer Defensive

IG

-

QCON

-

Energy

IG

-

QCON

-

Healthcare

IG

-

QCON

-

Industrials

IG

-

QCON
1.0%

Real Estate

IG

-

QCON

-

Technology

IG

-

QCON

-

Utilities

IG

-

QCON
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IG vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF (IG) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IG vs. QCON - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGQCONDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

Drawdowns

IG vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IG drawdown since its inception was -1.75%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IG and QCON.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGQCONDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.75%

0.00%

-1.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

0.00%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.54%

0.00%

-0.54%

Volatility

IG vs. QCON - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGQCONDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.94%

0.00%

+4.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.94%

0.00%

+4.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.94%

0.00%

+4.94%

IG vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison

IG has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

IG vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison

IG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, IG is cheaper at 0.26% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IG is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QCON.

IG has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.

They also come from different issuers: Principal and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for IG and 0.32% for QCON.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IG and QCON

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer