PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IG vs. BBCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IG vs. BBCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF (IG) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (BBCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IG

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.57%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BBCB

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.66%
YTD
2.82%
6M
2.66%
1Y
8.37%
3Y*
5.98%
5Y*
0.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IG vs. BBCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IG and BBCB is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026

0.94

IG vs. BBCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IG
BBCB

Financial Services

2.9%
21.9%

Basic Materials

-

1.6%

Communication Services

-

6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.1%

Energy

-

4.9%

Healthcare

-

8.8%

Industrials

-

7.1%

Real Estate

-

3.8%

Technology

-

7.8%

Utilities

-

8.6%

Financial Services

IG
2.9%
BBCB
21.9%

Basic Materials

IG

-

BBCB
1.6%

Communication Services

IG

-

BBCB
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

IG

-

BBCB
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

IG

-

BBCB
5.1%

Energy

IG

-

BBCB
4.9%

Healthcare

IG

-

BBCB
8.8%

Industrials

IG

-

BBCB
7.1%

Real Estate

IG

-

BBCB
3.8%

Technology

IG

-

BBCB
7.8%

Utilities

IG

-

BBCB
8.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IG vs. BBCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IG

BBCB
BBCB Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
BBCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBCB Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BBCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBCB Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IG vs. BBCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF (IG) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (BBCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IG vs. BBCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGBBCBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.40

0.46

-0.86

Drawdowns

IG vs. BBCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IG drawdown since its inception was -1.75%, smaller than the maximum BBCB drawdown of -22.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IG and BBCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGBBCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.75%

-22.48%

+20.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-0.34%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.53%

-6.66%

+6.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

Volatility

IG vs. BBCB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGBBCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.90%

4.93%

-0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.90%

7.25%

-2.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.90%

7.50%

-2.60%

IG vs. BBCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

IG has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than BBCB's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IG vs. BBCB - Dividend Comparison

IG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than BBCB's 7.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BBCB
JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
7.15%5.02%5.22%4.22%3.39%3.47%4.59%5.25%0.20%
IG
Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF
0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, IG and BBCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, BBCB is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BBCB is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for IG.

BBCB has the higher dividend yield at 7.15%, compared with 0.84% for IG.

They also come from different issuers: Principal and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for IG and 0.09% for BBCB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IG and BBCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer