PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IFSW.L vs. CHRG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IFSW.L vs. CHRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS (IFSW.L) and WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IFSW.L is traded in USD, while CHRG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CHRG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFSW.L achieves a 12.41% return, which is significantly lower than CHRG.L's 34.44% return.


IFSW.L

1D
-0.50%
1M
5.52%
YTD
12.41%
6M
13.96%
1Y
30.93%
3Y*
22.01%
5Y*
11.00%
10Y*
11.78%

CHRG.L

1D
-2.17%
1M
5.29%
YTD
34.44%
6M
34.93%
1Y
107.83%
3Y*
17.75%
5Y*
4.90%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFSW.L vs. CHRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IFSW.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS
12.41%25.73%17.05%15.35%-15.39%20.36%21.29%
CHRG.L
WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc
34.44%55.18%-13.38%-4.90%-27.75%13.85%85.14%

Correlation

The correlation between IFSW.L and CHRG.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2020

0.67

The correlation between IFSW.L and CHRG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

IFSW.L vs. CHRG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IFSW.L
CHRG.L

Technology

31.9%
8.2%

Financial Services

19.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
15.5%

Communication Services

8.0%

-

Healthcare

7.7%

-

Industrials

7.3%
48.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
0.0%

Energy

3.9%
6.1%

Basic Materials

2.2%
20.3%

Utilities

2.1%
1.3%

Real Estate

0.9%

-

Technology

IFSW.L
31.9%
CHRG.L
8.2%

Financial Services

IFSW.L
19.3%
CHRG.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

IFSW.L
10.7%
CHRG.L
15.5%

Communication Services

IFSW.L
8.0%
CHRG.L

-

Healthcare

IFSW.L
7.7%
CHRG.L

-

Industrials

IFSW.L
7.3%
CHRG.L
48.7%

Consumer Defensive

IFSW.L
5.7%
CHRG.L
0.0%

Energy

IFSW.L
3.9%
CHRG.L
6.1%

Basic Materials

IFSW.L
2.2%
CHRG.L
20.3%

Utilities

IFSW.L
2.1%
CHRG.L
1.3%

Real Estate

IFSW.L
0.9%
CHRG.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IFSW.L vs. CHRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFSW.L
IFSW.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
IFSW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFSW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFSW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IFSW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFSW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

CHRG.L
CHRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CHRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
CHRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFSW.L vs. CHRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS (IFSW.L) and WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IFSW.LCHRG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.52

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.85

3.48

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.31

6.81

+9.50

IFSW.L vs. CHRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFSW.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the CHRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFSW.L and CHRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IFSW.LCHRG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

2.03

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.15

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.53

+0.17

Drawdowns

IFSW.L vs. CHRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFSW.L drawdown since its inception was -34.49%, smaller than the maximum CHRG.L drawdown of -55.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFSW.L and CHRG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IFSW.LCHRG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.49%

-55.49%

+21.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.99%

-30.81%

+22.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.98%

-40.33%

+24.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.41%

-55.49%

+31.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-2.61%

+2.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.12%

-25.22%

+20.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

15.78%

-13.89%

Volatility

IFSW.L vs. CHRG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS (IFSW.L) is 3.45%, while WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L) has a volatility of 10.74%. This indicates that IFSW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IFSW.LCHRG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.45%

10.74%

-7.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.52%

20.29%

-10.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.28%

52.80%

-40.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.76%

31.81%

-16.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.19%

31.48%

-15.29%

IFSW.L vs. CHRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFSW.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than CHRG.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

IFSW.L vs. CHRG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IFSW.L nor CHRG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IFSW.L and CHRG.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CHRG.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CHRG.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IFSW.L.

IFSW.L is categorized as Global Equities, while CHRG.L is Alternative Energy Equities. IFSW.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while CHRG.L tracks WisdomTree Battery Solutions Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IFSW.L and 0.40% for CHRG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFSW.L and CHRG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer