IFSW.L vs. QWLD
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS (IFSW.L) and SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD).
IFSW.L and QWLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IFSW.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Sep 4, 2015. QWLD is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Factor Mix A-Series (USD). It was launched on Jun 4, 2014. Both IFSW.L and QWLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IFSW.L or QWLD.
Key characteristics
| IFSW.L | QWLD | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 15.85% | 16.06% |
| 1Y Return | 23.06% | 23.32% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.49% | 7.99% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 9.96% | 11.53% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.76 | 2.31 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.58% | 10.09% |
| Max Drawdown | -34.49% | -31.89% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.29% | -1.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFSW.L and QWLD is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
IFSW.L vs. QWLD - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IFSW.L having a 15.85% return and QWLD slightly higher at 16.06%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IFSW.L vs. QWLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFSW.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QWLD's 0.30% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IFSW.L vs. QWLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS (IFSW.L) and SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IFSW.L vs. QWLD - Dividend Comparison
IFSW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QWLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFSW.L iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QWLD SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF | 1.50% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 1.77% | 1.77% | 2.13% | 2.33% | 2.73% | 2.22% | 3.42% | 1.02% |
Drawdowns
IFSW.L vs. QWLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFSW.L drawdown since its inception was -34.49%, which is greater than QWLD's maximum drawdown of -31.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFSW.L and QWLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IFSW.L vs. QWLD - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS (IFSW.L) has a higher volatility of 3.89% compared to SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD) at 3.15%. This indicates that IFSW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QWLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.