PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IFS vs. EPU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IFS vs. EPU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intercorp Financial Services Inc. (IFS) and iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IFS vs. EPU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IFS
Intercorp Financial Services Inc.
18.51%49.00%39.89%-1.52%-5.41%-13.75%-16.06%-0.46%
EPU
iShares MSCI Peru ETF
11.55%86.87%21.73%25.34%2.05%-11.81%-4.31%7.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFS achieves a 18.51% return, which is significantly higher than EPU's 11.55% return.


IFS

1D
4.15%
1M
3.76%
YTD
18.51%
6M
24.44%
1Y
56.38%
3Y*
35.81%
5Y*
15.34%
10Y*

EPU

1D
5.99%
1M
-13.99%
YTD
11.55%
6M
31.78%
1Y
88.14%
3Y*
44.09%
5Y*
23.44%
10Y*
15.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IFS vs. EPU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFS
IFS Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
IFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFS Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
IFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFS Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

EPU
EPU Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
EPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPU Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
EPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPU Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFS vs. EPU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intercorp Financial Services Inc. (IFS) and iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IFSEPUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.01

3.02

-1.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.63

3.36

-0.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.49

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.08

4.16

-0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.19

17.19

-5.99

IFS vs. EPU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFS Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is lower than the EPU Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFS and EPU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IFSEPUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

3.02

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.94

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.45

-0.23

Correlation

The correlation between IFS and EPU is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

IFS vs. EPU - Dividend Comparison

IFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than EPU's 1.46% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IFS
Intercorp Financial Services Inc.
1.99%2.36%3.41%5.38%7.45%5.38%5.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EPU
iShares MSCI Peru ETF
1.46%1.63%5.78%4.17%5.56%3.13%1.91%2.67%1.53%3.30%0.85%1.90%

Drawdowns

IFS vs. EPU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFS drawdown since its inception was -55.33%, smaller than the maximum EPU drawdown of -60.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFS and EPU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IFSEPUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.33%

-60.62%

+5.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.40%

-20.85%

+7.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.33%

-35.59%

-8.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.52%

-13.99%

+11.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.37%

-18.90%

-6.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.88%

5.05%

-0.17%

Volatility

IFS vs. EPU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Intercorp Financial Services Inc. (IFS) is 10.89%, while iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) has a volatility of 14.15%. This indicates that IFS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IFSEPUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.89%

14.15%

-3.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.25%

24.04%

-3.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.18%

29.31%

-1.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.48%

25.08%

+8.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.92%

23.63%

+13.29%