PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IFS vs. EPU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IFS vs. EPU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intercorp Financial Services Inc. (IFS) and iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFS achieves a 46.90% return, which is significantly higher than EPU's 19.72% return.


IFS

1D
-1.48%
1M
5.15%
6M
38.37%
YTD
46.90%
1Y
69.65%
3Y*
39.68%
5Y*
27.24%
10Y*

EPU

1D
-1.33%
1M
-1.08%
6M
7.53%
YTD
19.72%
1Y
78.12%
3Y*
43.35%
5Y*
29.94%
10Y*
13.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFS vs. EPU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IFS
Intercorp Financial Services Inc.
46.90%49.00%39.89%-1.52%-5.41%-13.75%-16.06%2.61%
EPU
iShares MSCI Peru ETF
19.72%86.87%21.73%25.34%2.05%-11.81%-4.31%8.36%

Correlation

The correlation between IFS and EPU is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2019

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IFS vs. EPU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFS
IFS Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
IFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFS Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
IFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFS Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

EPU
EPU Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
EPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPU Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPU Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFS vs. EPU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intercorp Financial Services Inc. (IFS) and iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IFSEPUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.39

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.22

3.77

+1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.18

10.39

+2.78

IFS vs. EPU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFS Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the EPU Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFS and EPU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IFS vs. EPU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFS drawdown since its inception was -55.33%, smaller than the maximum EPU drawdown of -60.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFS and EPU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IFSEPUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.33%

-60.62%

+5.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.40%

-20.85%

+7.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.42%

-20.85%

-7.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.33%

-35.59%

-8.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

-7.70%

+6.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.51%

-18.76%

-5.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.30%

7.54%

-2.24%

Volatility

IFS vs. EPU - Volatility Comparison

Intercorp Financial Services Inc. (IFS) and iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) have volatilities of 9.78% and 9.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IFSEPUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.78%

9.54%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.13%

27.25%

+0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.41%

31.60%

+1.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.74%

25.20%

+7.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.28%

23.65%

+13.63%

Dividends

IFS vs. EPU - Dividend Comparison

IFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, more than EPU's 2.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPU
iShares MSCI Peru ETF
2.00%1.63%5.78%4.17%5.56%3.13%1.91%2.67%1.53%3.30%0.85%1.90%
IFS
Intercorp Financial Services Inc.
3.01%2.36%3.41%5.38%7.45%5.38%5.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IFS and EPU have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IFS has higher volatility (9.78%) compared to EPU (9.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFS dropped -55.33% vs EPU's -60.62%.

EPU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFS and EPU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer