PortfoliosLab logo
IFS vs. BAP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between IFS and BAP is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

IFS vs. BAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intercorp Financial Services Inc. (IFS) and Credicorp Ltd. (BAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
13.50%
11.68%
IFS
BAP

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IFS:

2.13

BAP:

0.78

Sortino Ratio

IFS:

3.06

BAP:

1.43

Omega Ratio

IFS:

1.41

BAP:

1.18

Calmar Ratio

IFS:

1.71

BAP:

0.89

Martin Ratio

IFS:

14.27

BAP:

4.15

Ulcer Index

IFS:

4.23%

BAP:

5.69%

Daily Std Dev

IFS:

25.75%

BAP:

24.85%

Max Drawdown

IFS:

-55.33%

BAP:

-73.42%

Current Drawdown

IFS:

-0.84%

BAP:

-1.85%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IFS:

$3.91B

BAP:

$15.94B

EPS

IFS:

$3.10

BAP:

$18.45

PE Ratio

IFS:

11.12

BAP:

10.88

PS Ratio

IFS:

0.87

BAP:

0.88

PB Ratio

IFS:

1.34

BAP:

1.74

Total Revenue (TTM)

IFS:

$5.48B

BAP:

$20.74B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IFS:

$6.00B

BAP:

$20.74B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFS achieves a 20.86% return, which is significantly higher than BAP's 12.03% return.


IFS

YTD

20.86%

1M

14.10%

6M

31.43%

1Y

54.45%

5Y*

11.99%

10Y*

N/A

BAP

YTD

12.03%

1M

15.36%

6M

11.01%

1Y

19.25%

5Y*

8.81%

10Y*

5.64%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

IFS vs. BAP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IFS is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IFS is 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IFS is 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IFS is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IFS is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IFS is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

BAP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BAP is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BAP is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BAP is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BAP is 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BAP is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BAP is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IFS vs. BAP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intercorp Financial Services Inc. (IFS) and Credicorp Ltd. (BAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current IFS Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the BAP Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFS and BAP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
2.13
0.78
IFS
BAP

Dividends

IFS vs. BAP - Dividend Comparison

IFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, more than BAP's 1.87% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IFS
Intercorp Financial Services Inc.
2.91%3.41%5.38%7.45%5.38%5.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BAP
Credicorp Ltd.
1.87%2.10%0.45%0.29%4.10%5.37%3.94%0.20%4.32%1.47%2.25%1.19%

Drawdowns

IFS vs. BAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFS drawdown since its inception was -55.33%, smaller than the maximum BAP drawdown of -73.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFS and BAP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.84%
0
IFS
BAP

Volatility

IFS vs. BAP - Volatility Comparison

Intercorp Financial Services Inc. (IFS) has a higher volatility of 8.23% compared to Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) at 7.60%. This indicates that IFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
8.23%
7.60%
IFS
BAP

Financials

IFS vs. BAP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intercorp Financial Services Inc. and Credicorp Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20212022202320242025
1.35B
4.93B
(IFS) Total Revenue
(BAP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

IFS vs. BAP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Intercorp Financial Services Inc. and Credicorp Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

75.0%80.0%85.0%90.0%95.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
100.0%
(IFS) Gross Margin
(BAP) Gross Margin
IFS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Intercorp Financial Services Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.35B and revenue of 1.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

BAP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Credicorp Ltd. reported a gross profit of 4.93B and revenue of 4.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

IFS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Intercorp Financial Services Inc. reported an operating income of 743.14M and revenue of 1.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 55.1%.

BAP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Credicorp Ltd. reported an operating income of 2.67B and revenue of 4.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 54.2%.

IFS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Intercorp Financial Services Inc. reported a net income of 487.55M and revenue of 1.35B, resulting in a net margin of 36.2%.

BAP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Credicorp Ltd. reported a net income of 1.13B and revenue of 4.93B, resulting in a net margin of 22.9%.