PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IFS vs. BAP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between IFS and BAP is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

IFS vs. BAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intercorp Financial Services Inc. (IFS) and Credicorp Ltd. (BAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
35.57%
11.32%
IFS
BAP

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

IFS:

0.95

BAP:

0.50

Sortino Ratio

IFS:

1.46

BAP:

0.86

Omega Ratio

IFS:

1.19

BAP:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

IFS:

0.70

BAP:

0.43

Martin Ratio

IFS:

1.70

BAP:

2.08

Ulcer Index

IFS:

15.26%

BAP:

5.47%

Daily Std Dev

IFS:

27.17%

BAP:

22.86%

Max Drawdown

IFS:

-55.33%

BAP:

-73.50%

Current Drawdown

IFS:

-3.68%

BAP:

-11.99%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

IFS:

$3.68B

BAP:

$14.63B

EPS

IFS:

$3.07

BAP:

$18.34

PE Ratio

IFS:

10.53

BAP:

10.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

IFS:

$4.35B

BAP:

$14.83B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IFS:

$4.87B

BAP:

$14.83B

EBITDA (TTM)

IFS:

$440.11M

BAP:

$4.14B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFS achieves a 10.16% return, which is significantly higher than BAP's 0.45% return.


IFS

YTD

10.16%

1M

10.84%

6M

35.57%

1Y

17.69%

5Y*

0.59%

10Y*

N/A

BAP

YTD

0.45%

1M

1.10%

6M

11.32%

1Y

12.65%

5Y*

1.32%

10Y*

4.85%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

IFS vs. BAP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IFS is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IFS is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IFS is 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IFS is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IFS is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IFS is 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

BAP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BAP is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BAP is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BAP is 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BAP is 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BAP is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BAP is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IFS vs. BAP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intercorp Financial Services Inc. (IFS) and Credicorp Ltd. (BAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IFS, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.000.950.50
The chart of Sortino ratio for IFS, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.460.86
The chart of Omega ratio for IFS, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.191.10
The chart of Calmar ratio for IFS, currently valued at 0.70, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.700.59
The chart of Martin ratio for IFS, currently valued at 1.70, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.702.08
IFS
BAP

The current IFS Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is higher than the BAP Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFS and BAP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.95
0.50
IFS
BAP

Dividends

IFS vs. BAP - Dividend Comparison

IFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, more than BAP's 2.09% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
IFS
Intercorp Financial Services Inc.
3.09%3.41%5.38%7.45%5.38%5.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BAP
Credicorp Ltd.
2.09%2.10%0.45%0.29%4.10%5.37%3.94%0.20%4.32%1.47%2.25%1.19%

Drawdowns

IFS vs. BAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFS drawdown since its inception was -55.33%, smaller than the maximum BAP drawdown of -73.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFS and BAP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-3.68%
-7.30%
IFS
BAP

Volatility

IFS vs. BAP - Volatility Comparison

Intercorp Financial Services Inc. (IFS) has a higher volatility of 6.18% compared to Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) at 5.27%. This indicates that IFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
6.18%
5.27%
IFS
BAP

Financials

IFS vs. BAP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intercorp Financial Services Inc. and Credicorp Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab