IFRA vs. FIDU
IFRA (iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF) and FIDU (Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IFRA is a Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index (TR), while FIDU is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Industrials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IFRA returned 13.28%/yr vs 13.30%/yr for FIDU. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IFRA charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FIDU.
Performance
IFRA vs. FIDU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IFRA having a 16.00% return and FIDU slightly higher at 16.05%.
IFRA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.67%
- 6M
- 8.92%
- YTD
- 16.00%
- 1Y
- 23.20%
- 3Y*
- 16.79%
- 5Y*
- 13.28%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.22%
FIDU
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -3.08%
- 6M
- 7.73%
- YTD
- 16.05%
- 1Y
- 21.56%
- 3Y*
- 18.89%
- 5Y*
- 13.30%
- 10Y*
- 14.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.05M | $8.74M | $9.96M | |
| $20.72M | $20.65M | $23.36M |
IFRA vs. FIDU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF | 16.00% | 15.90% | 17.02% | 13.42% | -3.32% | 29.81% | 7.37% | 27.00% | -7.97% |
FIDU Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF | 16.05% | 18.61% | 16.51% | 22.62% | -8.36% | 20.96% | 13.72% | 30.69% | -12.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFRA and FIDU is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018 | 0.86 |
The correlation between IFRA and FIDU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
IFRA vs. FIDU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IFRA
FIDU
Utilities
Industrials
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
IFRA
FIDU
Industrials
IFRA
FIDU
Basic Materials
IFRA
FIDU
Energy
IFRA
FIDU
Consumer Cyclical
IFRA
FIDU
Consumer Defensive
IFRA
FIDU
Communication Services
IFRA
-
FIDU
Financial Services
IFRA
-
FIDU
Healthcare
IFRA
-
FIDU
Real Estate
IFRA
-
FIDU
Technology
IFRA
-
FIDU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IFRA vs. FIDU — Risk / Return Rank
IFRA
FIDU
IFRA vs. FIDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) and Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IFRA | FIDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.19 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 1.61 | +1.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.59 | 6.39 | +2.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IFRA vs. FIDU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFRA drawdown since its inception was -41.06%, roughly equal to the maximum FIDU drawdown of -42.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFRA and FIDU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFRA | FIDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.06% | -42.31% | +1.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.40% | -12.23% | +3.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.93% | -20.52% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.93% | -22.87% | +2.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.46% | -4.41% | -1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.09% | -4.77% | -0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 3.09% | -0.54% |
Volatility
IFRA vs. FIDU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) is 4.01%, while Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU) has a volatility of 5.09%. This indicates that IFRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIDU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IFRA | FIDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.01% | 5.09% | -1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.02% | 14.73% | -2.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.40% | 18.03% | -2.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.87% | 18.47% | -0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.29% | 20.37% | +0.92% |
IFRA vs. FIDU - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFRA has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FIDU's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
IFRA vs. FIDU - Dividend Comparison
IFRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than FIDU's 0.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIDU Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF | 0.95% | 1.02% | 1.42% | 1.42% | 1.48% | 1.12% | 1.28% | 1.73% | 1.99% | 1.60% | 1.63% | 1.98% |
IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF | 1.61% | 1.84% | 1.75% | 1.98% | 1.98% | 1.63% | 2.08% | 1.68% | 2.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IFRA and FIDU have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIDU has higher volatility (5.09%) compared to IFRA (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFRA dropped -41.06% vs FIDU's -42.31%.
On 5-year performance, FIDU leads with 13.30% vs 13.28% for IFRA. On fees, FIDU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, IFRA has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FIDU has performed better with a 13.30% return vs 13.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FIDU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IFRA.
IFRA has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.95% for FIDU.
IFRA is categorized as Infrastructure Equities, while FIDU is Industrials Equities. IFRA tracks NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index (TR), while FIDU tracks MSCI USA IMI Industrials Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IFRA and 0.08% for FIDU.
IFRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IFRA and FIDU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer