PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IFRA vs. AAAZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IFRA vs. AAAZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) and DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund (AAAZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFRA achieves a 16.00% return, which is significantly higher than AAAZX's 11.24% return.


IFRA

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.67%
6M
8.92%
YTD
16.00%
1Y
23.20%
3Y*
16.79%
5Y*
13.28%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.22%

AAAZX

1D
0.38%
1M
2.63%
6M
3.32%
YTD
11.24%
1Y
18.05%
3Y*
10.37%
5Y*
5.43%
10Y*
7.15%
ALL TIME*
4.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$20.72M$20.65M$23.36M

IFRA vs. AAAZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IFRA
iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF
16.00%15.90%17.02%13.42%-3.32%29.81%7.37%27.00%-7.97%
AAAZX
DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund
11.24%13.14%5.49%2.64%-9.57%23.83%3.91%21.79%-2.38%

Correlation

The correlation between IFRA and AAAZX is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018

0.76

The correlation between IFRA and AAAZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IFRA vs. AAAZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IFRA
IFRA Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
IFRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFRA Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IFRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFRA Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

AAAZX
AAAZX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
AAAZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAAZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAAZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
AAAZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAAZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IFRA vs. AAAZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) and DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund (AAAZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IFRAAAAZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.34

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

3.01

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.59

8.25

+0.33

IFRA vs. AAAZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFRA Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the AAAZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFRA and AAAZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IFRA vs. AAAZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFRA drawdown since its inception was -41.06%, roughly equal to the maximum AAAZX drawdown of -40.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFRA and AAAZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IFRAAAAZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.06%

-40.45%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.40%

-5.78%

-2.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.93%

-10.06%

-9.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.93%

-22.52%

+2.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.46%

-2.32%

-3.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.09%

-6.60%

+1.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

2.11%

+0.44%

Volatility

IFRA vs. AAAZX - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund (AAAZX) at 2.16%. This indicates that IFRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAAZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IFRAAAAZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

2.16%

+1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.02%

7.48%

+4.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.40%

9.33%

+6.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.87%

12.07%

+5.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.29%

12.70%

+8.59%

IFRA vs. AAAZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFRA has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than AAAZX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

IFRA vs. AAAZX - Dividend Comparison

IFRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than AAAZX's 6.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAAZX
DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund
6.60%4.15%2.85%2.40%4.50%2.62%1.60%2.07%1.89%1.79%1.82%2.53%
IFRA
iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF
1.61%1.84%1.75%1.98%1.98%1.63%2.08%1.68%2.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IFRA and AAAZX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IFRA has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to AAAZX (2.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFRA dropped -41.06% vs AAAZX's -40.45%.

AAAZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFRA and AAAZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer