IFLN vs. MYHA
IFLN (Invesco Bloomberg Enhanced Fallen Angels ETF) and MYHA (State Street My2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. IFLN is passively managed, while MYHA is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IFLN charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for MYHA.
Performance
IFLN vs. MYHA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IFLN
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 1Y
- 5.49%
- 3Y*
- 7.14%
- 5Y*
- 3.54%
- 10Y*
- 4.36%
MYHA
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IFLN vs. MYHA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IFLN Invesco Bloomberg Enhanced Fallen Angels ETF | 0.59% |
MYHA State Street My2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFLN and MYHA is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2026 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IFLN vs. MYHA — Risk / Return Rank
IFLN
MYHA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IFLN vs. MYHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Enhanced Fallen Angels ETF (IFLN) and State Street My2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (MYHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IFLN | MYHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.54 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IFLN vs. MYHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFLN drawdown since its inception was -44.79%, which is greater than MYHA's maximum drawdown of -0.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFLN and MYHA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFLN | MYHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.79% | -0.69% | -44.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | 0.00% | -0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.30% | -0.11% | -4.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | — | — |
Volatility
IFLN vs. MYHA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IFLN | MYHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.79% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.30% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.93% | 1.80% | +2.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.38% | 1.80% | +4.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.86% | 1.80% | +5.06% |
IFLN vs. MYHA - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFLN has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than MYHA's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
IFLN vs. MYHA - Dividend Comparison
IFLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, more than MYHA's 2.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFLN Invesco Bloomberg Enhanced Fallen Angels ETF | 5.85% | 5.48% | 5.69% | 4.68% | 3.52% | 3.37% | 3.90% | 4.03% | 4.44% | 4.14% | 4.58% | 4.69% |
MYHA State Street My2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 2.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IFLN and MYHA have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IFLN is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IFLN is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for MYHA.
IFLN has the higher dividend yield at 5.85%, compared with 2.06% for MYHA.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for IFLN and 0.39% for MYHA.
Find the right allocation for IFLN and MYHA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer