MYHA vs. FLRT
MYHA (State Street My2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and FLRT (Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MYHA is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by State Street, while FLRT is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by Pacer. Both are actively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MYHA charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FLRT.
Performance
MYHA vs. FLRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MYHA
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
FLRT
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- 6M
- 1.58%
- YTD
- 2.24%
- 1Y
- 5.00%
- 3Y*
- 7.91%
- 5Y*
- 6.02%
- 10Y*
- 4.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.72M | $4.39M | $4.69M | |
| $845.05 | $2.44K | $8.52K |
MYHA vs. FLRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MYHA State Street My2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.48% |
FLRT Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF | 2.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between MYHA and FLRT is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2026 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MYHA vs. FLRT — Risk / Return Rank
MYHA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FLRT
MYHA vs. FLRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street My2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (MYHA) and Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF (FLRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MYHA | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.76 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.82 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.36 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MYHA vs. FLRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MYHA drawdown since its inception was -0.69%, smaller than the maximum FLRT drawdown of -20.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MYHA and FLRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MYHA | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.69% | -20.96% | +20.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.78% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -2.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -7.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -0.12% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.11% | -1.40% | +1.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.48% | — |
Volatility
MYHA vs. FLRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MYHA | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.20% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.77% | 1.48% | +0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.77% | 2.30% | -0.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.77% | 6.10% | -4.33% |
MYHA vs. FLRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
MYHA has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than FLRT's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
MYHA vs. FLRT - Dividend Comparison
MYHA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than FLRT's 7.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLRT Pacer Aristotle Pacific Floating Rate High Income ETF | 7.26% | 6.93% | 7.93% | 8.40% | 5.81% | 3.16% | 3.52% | 4.30% | 3.95% | 3.20% | 3.38% | 3.21% |
MYHA State Street My2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 2.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MYHA and FLRT have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MYHA is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MYHA is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FLRT.
FLRT has the higher dividend yield at 7.26%, compared with 2.06% for MYHA.
MYHA is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while FLRT is Bank Loan. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for MYHA and 0.60% for FLRT.
Find the right allocation for MYHA and FLRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer