IFLN vs. FSYD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IFLN (Invesco Bloomberg Enhanced Fallen Angels ETF) and FSYD (Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. IFLN is passively managed, while FSYD is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IFLN returned 7.32%/yr vs 9.54%/yr for FSYD. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IFLN charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for FSYD.

Performance

IFLN vs. FSYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bloomberg Enhanced Fallen Angels ETF (IFLN) and Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF (FSYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFLN achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly lower than FSYD's 3.35% return.

IFLN

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 0.55%
• YTD: 0.57%
• 6M: 0.84%
• 1Y: 5.87%
• 3Y*: 7.32%
• 5Y*: 3.59%
• 10Y*: 4.60%

FSYD

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 3.35%
• 6M: 3.97%
• 1Y: 10.19%
• 3Y*: 9.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFLN vs. FSYD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
IFLN Invesco Bloomberg Enhanced Fallen Angels ETF	0.57%	8.75%	5.54%	11.19%	-4.73%
FSYD Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF	3.35%	9.09%	8.74%	12.22%	-6.59%

Correlation

The correlation between IFLN and FSYD is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022	0.92

The correlation between IFLN and FSYD shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

IFLN vs. FSYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFLN

IFLN Risk / Return Rank: 40
IFLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
IFLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
IFLN Omega Ratio Rank: 46
IFLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
IFLN Martin Ratio Rank: 38

FSYD

FSYD Risk / Return Rank: 79
FSYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
FSYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FSYD Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FSYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
FSYD Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFLN vs. FSYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Enhanced Fallen Angels ETF (IFLN) and Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF (FSYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IFLN	FSYD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	2.49	-0.97
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	3.79	-1.59
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.50	-0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.44	3.83	-2.38
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.93	15.34	-9.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IFLN vs. FSYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFLN Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the FSYD Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFLN and FSYD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IFLN	FSYD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.52	2.49	-0.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	0.77	-0.48

Drawdowns

IFLN vs. FSYD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFLN drawdown since its inception was -44.79%, which is greater than FSYD's maximum drawdown of -12.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFLN and FSYD.

Drawdown Indicators

	IFLN	FSYD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.79%	-12.11%	-32.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.08%	-2.67%	-1.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.08%	-5.49%	+1.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	-0.27%	-0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.33%	-2.40%	-1.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.99%	0.67%	+0.32%

Volatility

IFLN vs. FSYD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Bloomberg Enhanced Fallen Angels ETF (IFLN) has a higher volatility of 1.26% compared to Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF (FSYD) at 1.12%. This indicates that IFLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IFLN	FSYD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.26%	1.12%	+0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.17%	3.13%	+0.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.90%	4.12%	-0.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.37%	7.85%	-1.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.89%	7.85%	-0.96%

IFLN vs. FSYD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFLN has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than FSYD's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

IFLN vs. FSYD - Dividend Comparison

IFLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, less than FSYD's 6.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSYD Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF	6.32%	6.49%	6.47%	6.70%	5.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IFLN Invesco Bloomberg Enhanced Fallen Angels ETF	5.82%	5.48%	5.69%	4.68%	3.52%	3.37%	3.90%	4.03%	4.44%	4.14%	4.58%	4.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IFLN and FSYD in my portfolio?

IFLN and FSYD have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IFLN or FSYD?

IFLN has higher volatility (1.26%) compared to FSYD (1.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFLN dropped -44.79% vs FSYD's -12.11%.

Which ETF is better, IFLN or FSYD?

On 3-year performance, FSYD leads with 9.54% vs 7.32% for IFLN. On fees, IFLN is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, FSYD has been the lower-risk option at 1.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IFLN or FSYD?

Over the 3-year period, FSYD has performed better with a 9.54% return vs 7.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IFLN or FSYD?

IFLN is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for FSYD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IFLN or FSYD?

FSYD has the higher dividend yield at 6.32%, compared with 5.82% for IFLN.

What is the main difference between IFLN and FSYD?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for IFLN and 0.55% for FSYD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.