IFGL vs. SOXX
IFGL (iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF) and SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IFGL is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Real Estate ex-U.S. Index, while SOXX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the NYSE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IFGL returned 1.41%/yr vs 35.79%/yr for SOXX. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IFGL charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for SOXX.
Performance
IFGL vs. SOXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFGL achieves a -2.19% return, which is significantly lower than SOXX's 104.57% return. Over the past 10 years, IFGL has underperformed SOXX with an annualized return of 1.41%, while SOXX has yielded a comparatively higher 35.79% annualized return.
IFGL
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -4.06%
- YTD
- -2.19%
- 6M
- -0.58%
- 1Y
- 6.13%
- 3Y*
- 6.59%
- 5Y*
- -2.66%
- 10Y*
- 1.41%
SOXX
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- 33.25%
- YTD
- 104.57%
- 6M
- 99.43%
- 1Y
- 190.05%
- 3Y*
- 57.39%
- 5Y*
- 34.50%
- 10Y*
- 35.79%
IFGL vs. SOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFGL iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF | -2.19% | 24.31% | -7.25% | 5.40% | -24.21% | 8.29% | -7.62% | 20.65% | -6.39% | 20.00% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 104.57% | 40.74% | 12.92% | 67.12% | -35.09% | 44.09% | 52.72% | 62.42% | -6.49% | 39.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFGL and SOXX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2007 | 0.52 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IFGL and SOXX has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IFGL vs. SOXX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IFGL
SOXX
Real Estate
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
IFGL
SOXX
-
Technology
IFGL
SOXX
Consumer Cyclical
IFGL
SOXX
-
Basic Materials
IFGL
-
SOXX
-
Communication Services
IFGL
-
SOXX
-
Consumer Defensive
IFGL
-
SOXX
-
Energy
IFGL
-
SOXX
-
Financial Services
IFGL
-
SOXX
-
Healthcare
IFGL
-
SOXX
-
Industrials
IFGL
-
SOXX
-
Utilities
IFGL
-
SOXX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IFGL vs. SOXX — Risk / Return Rank
IFGL
SOXX
IFGL vs. SOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IFGL | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.74 | -0.65 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 12.13 | -11.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.32 | 46.43 | -45.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IFGL | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | 5.61 | -5.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 | 0.96 | -1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 | 1.07 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.45 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
IFGL vs. SOXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFGL drawdown since its inception was -67.94%, roughly equal to the maximum SOXX drawdown of -70.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFGL and SOXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFGL | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.94% | -70.21% | +2.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.38% | -15.77% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.77% | -41.36% | +22.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.47% | -45.75% | +7.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.38% | -45.75% | +5.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.94% | 0.00% | -14.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.68% | -19.97% | +3.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.65% | 4.11% | +0.54% |
Volatility
IFGL vs. SOXX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) is 4.54%, while iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a volatility of 14.03%. This indicates that IFGL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IFGL | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 14.03% | -9.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.46% | 27.35% | -15.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.68% | 34.18% | -20.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 36.11% | -19.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 33.43% | -16.84% |
IFGL vs. SOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFGL has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXX's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
IFGL vs. SOXX - Dividend Comparison
IFGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, more than SOXX's 0.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFGL iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF | 3.90% | 3.71% | 4.83% | 1.82% | 2.79% | 3.25% | 2.17% | 7.60% | 4.10% | 4.90% | 7.68% | 3.70% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 0.27% | 0.57% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.26% | 0.64% | 0.81% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 1.08% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IFGL and SOXX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXX has higher volatility (14.03%) compared to IFGL (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFGL dropped -67.94% vs SOXX's -70.21%.
On 10-year performance, SOXX leads with 35.79% vs 1.41% for IFGL. On fees, SOXX is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, IFGL has been the lower-risk option at 4.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 35.79% return vs 1.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXX is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for IFGL.
IFGL has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 0.27% for SOXX.
IFGL is categorized as REIT, while SOXX is Semiconductors. IFGL tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Real Estate ex-U.S. Index, while SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for IFGL and 0.34% for SOXX.
SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.61 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IFGL and SOXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer