IFGL vs. INDS
IFGL (iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF) and INDS (Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF) are both REIT funds - IFGL tracks the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Real Estate ex-U.S. Index while INDS tracks the Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IFGL returned -2.66%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for INDS. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IFGL charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for INDS.
Performance
IFGL vs. INDS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFGL achieves a -2.19% return, which is significantly lower than INDS's 6.59% return.
IFGL
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -4.06%
- YTD
- -2.19%
- 6M
- -0.58%
- 1Y
- 6.13%
- 3Y*
- 6.59%
- 5Y*
- -2.66%
- 10Y*
- 1.41%
INDS
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 6.59%
- 6M
- 5.24%
- 1Y
- 9.81%
- 3Y*
- 2.57%
- 5Y*
- 0.82%
- 10Y*
- —
IFGL vs. INDS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFGL iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF | -2.19% | 24.31% | -7.25% | 5.40% | -24.21% | 8.29% | -7.62% | 20.65% | -7.48% |
INDS Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF | 6.59% | 7.78% | -12.69% | 17.72% | -32.68% | 54.61% | 12.62% | 42.25% | -0.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFGL and INDS is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018 | 0.62 |
The correlation between IFGL and INDS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
IFGL vs. INDS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IFGL
INDS
Real Estate
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
IFGL
INDS
Technology
IFGL
INDS
-
Consumer Cyclical
IFGL
INDS
-
Basic Materials
IFGL
-
INDS
-
Communication Services
IFGL
-
INDS
-
Consumer Defensive
IFGL
-
INDS
-
Energy
IFGL
-
INDS
-
Financial Services
IFGL
-
INDS
-
Healthcare
IFGL
-
INDS
-
Industrials
IFGL
-
INDS
-
Utilities
IFGL
-
INDS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IFGL vs. INDS — Risk / Return Rank
IFGL
INDS
IFGL vs. INDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) and Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IFGL | INDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.11 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 0.81 | -0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.32 | 2.44 | -1.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IFGL | INDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | 0.61 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 | 0.04 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.38 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
IFGL vs. INDS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFGL drawdown since its inception was -67.94%, which is greater than INDS's maximum drawdown of -40.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFGL and INDS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFGL | INDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.94% | -40.17% | -27.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.38% | -12.23% | -2.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.77% | -26.96% | +8.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.47% | -40.17% | +1.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.94% | -20.51% | +5.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.68% | -15.57% | -1.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.65% | 4.04% | +0.61% |
Volatility
IFGL vs. INDS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) is 4.54%, while Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS) has a volatility of 5.23%. This indicates that IFGL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IFGL | INDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 5.23% | -0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.46% | 12.10% | -0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.68% | 16.23% | -2.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 20.16% | -3.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 23.11% | -6.52% |
IFGL vs. INDS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFGL has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than INDS's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
IFGL vs. INDS - Dividend Comparison
IFGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, more than INDS's 3.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFGL iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF | 3.90% | 3.71% | 4.83% | 1.82% | 2.79% | 3.25% | 2.17% | 7.60% | 4.10% | 4.90% | 7.68% | 3.70% |
INDS Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF | 3.55% | 3.70% | 3.75% | 3.11% | 2.63% | 1.24% | 1.68% | 2.26% | 1.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IFGL and INDS have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INDS has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to IFGL (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFGL dropped -67.94% vs INDS's -40.17%.
On 5-year performance, INDS leads with 0.82% vs -2.66% for IFGL. On fees, IFGL is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, IFGL has been the lower-risk option at 4.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, INDS has performed better with a 0.82% return vs -2.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IFGL is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for INDS.
IFGL has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 3.55% for INDS.
IFGL tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Real Estate ex-U.S. Index, while INDS tracks Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for IFGL and 0.60% for INDS.
INDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IFGL and INDS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer