IFGL vs. FRI
IFGL (iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF) and FRI (First Trust S&P REIT Index Fund) are both REIT funds - IFGL tracks the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Real Estate ex-U.S. Index while FRI tracks the S&P United States REIT. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IFGL returned 1.41%/yr vs 5.62%/yr for FRI. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IFGL charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FRI.
Performance
IFGL vs. FRI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFGL achieves a -2.19% return, which is significantly lower than FRI's 11.90% return. Over the past 10 years, IFGL has underperformed FRI with an annualized return of 1.41%, while FRI has yielded a comparatively higher 5.62% annualized return.
IFGL
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -4.06%
- YTD
- -2.19%
- 6M
- -0.58%
- 1Y
- 6.13%
- 3Y*
- 6.59%
- 5Y*
- -2.66%
- 10Y*
- 1.41%
FRI
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- YTD
- 11.90%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 14.73%
- 3Y*
- 11.09%
- 5Y*
- 4.41%
- 10Y*
- 5.62%
IFGL vs. FRI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFGL iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF | -2.19% | 24.31% | -7.25% | 5.40% | -24.21% | 8.29% | -7.62% | 20.65% | -6.39% | 20.00% |
FRI First Trust S&P REIT Index Fund | 11.90% | 2.80% | 7.84% | 13.33% | -24.66% | 42.55% | -7.90% | 23.67% | -4.28% | 3.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFGL and FRI is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2007 | 0.58 |
The correlation between IFGL and FRI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
IFGL vs. FRI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IFGL
FRI
Real Estate
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
IFGL
FRI
Technology
IFGL
FRI
-
Consumer Cyclical
IFGL
FRI
-
Basic Materials
IFGL
-
FRI
-
Communication Services
IFGL
-
FRI
-
Consumer Defensive
IFGL
-
FRI
-
Energy
IFGL
-
FRI
-
Financial Services
IFGL
-
FRI
Healthcare
IFGL
-
FRI
-
Industrials
IFGL
-
FRI
-
Utilities
IFGL
-
FRI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IFGL vs. FRI — Risk / Return Rank
IFGL
FRI
IFGL vs. FRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) and First Trust S&P REIT Index Fund (FRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IFGL | FRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.20 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 1.95 | -1.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.32 | 6.21 | -4.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IFGL | FRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | 1.13 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 | 0.24 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 | 0.27 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.18 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
IFGL vs. FRI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFGL drawdown since its inception was -67.94%, smaller than the maximum FRI drawdown of -71.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFGL and FRI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFGL | FRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.94% | -71.95% | +4.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.38% | -7.57% | -6.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.77% | -18.90% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.47% | -31.21% | -7.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.38% | -44.16% | +3.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.94% | -3.24% | -11.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.68% | -13.70% | -2.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.65% | 2.38% | +2.27% |
Volatility
IFGL vs. FRI - Volatility Comparison
iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF (IFGL) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to First Trust S&P REIT Index Fund (FRI) at 3.93%. This indicates that IFGL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IFGL | FRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 3.93% | +0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.46% | 9.14% | +2.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.68% | 13.05% | +0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 18.65% | -2.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 21.06% | -4.47% |
IFGL vs. FRI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFGL has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than FRI's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IFGL vs. FRI - Dividend Comparison
IFGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, more than FRI's 2.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRI First Trust S&P REIT Index Fund | 2.60% | 2.99% | 3.33% | 3.24% | 2.52% | 1.44% | 3.08% | 2.28% | 3.21% | 2.82% | 3.27% | 2.66% |
IFGL iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF | 3.90% | 3.71% | 4.83% | 1.82% | 2.79% | 3.25% | 2.17% | 7.60% | 4.10% | 4.90% | 7.68% | 3.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IFGL and FRI have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IFGL has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to FRI (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFGL dropped -67.94% vs FRI's -71.95%.
On 10-year performance, FRI leads with 5.62% vs 1.41% for IFGL. On fees, IFGL is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, FRI has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FRI has performed better with a 5.62% return vs 1.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IFGL is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FRI.
IFGL has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 2.60% for FRI.
IFGL tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Real Estate ex-U.S. Index, while FRI tracks S&P United States REIT. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for IFGL and 0.50% for FRI.
FRI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IFGL and FRI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer