PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IFEB vs. XLRI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IFEB vs. XLRI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February (IFEB) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFEB achieves a 4.84% return, which is significantly lower than XLRI's 8.45% return.


IFEB

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.00%
6M
3.90%
YTD
4.84%
1Y
11.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.87%

XLRI

1D
0.16%
1M
1.35%
6M
6.08%
YTD
8.45%
1Y
10.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$236.38K$418.05K$331.11K
$84.19K$69.65K$65.16K

IFEB vs. XLRI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IFEB and XLRI is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IFEB vs. XLRI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IFEB
IFEB Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
IFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
IFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

XLRI
XLRI Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
XLRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLRI Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
XLRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLRI Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IFEB vs. XLRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February (IFEB) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IFEBXLRIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.18

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

1.48

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.42

5.18

+2.25

IFEB vs. XLRI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFEB Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is higher than the XLRI Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFEB and XLRI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IFEB vs. XLRI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFEB drawdown since its inception was -8.84%, which is greater than XLRI's maximum drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFEB and XLRI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IFEBXLRIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.84%

-7.12%

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-7.12%

+0.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-0.62%

+0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.61%

-1.54%

-0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

2.03%

-0.45%

Volatility

IFEB vs. XLRI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February (IFEB) is 2.30%, while State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI) has a volatility of 3.42%. This indicates that IFEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLRI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IFEBXLRIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.30%

3.42%

-1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.37%

8.72%

-1.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.98%

11.09%

-3.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.07%

11.11%

-2.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.07%

11.11%

-2.04%

IFEB vs. XLRI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFEB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than XLRI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IFEB vs. XLRI - Dividend Comparison

IFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.52%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IFEB and XLRI have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLRI has higher volatility (3.42%) compared to IFEB (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFEB dropped -8.84% vs XLRI's -7.12%.

On 1-year performance, IFEB leads with 11.77% vs 10.59% for XLRI. On fees, XLRI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IFEB has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IFEB has performed better with a 11.77% return vs 10.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLRI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IFEB.

XLRI has the higher dividend yield at 13.52%, compared with 0.00% for IFEB.

IFEB is categorized as Options Trading, while XLRI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IFEB and 0.35% for XLRI.

IFEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFEB and XLRI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer