IFEB vs. BWET

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IFEB (Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February) and BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IFEB is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. IFEB is actively managed, while BWET is passively managed. Over the past year, IFEB returned 10.26% vs 1800.91% for BWET. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. IFEB charges 0.85%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for BWET.

Performance

IFEB vs. BWET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February (IFEB) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFEB achieves a 2.84% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 875.88% return.

IFEB

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 1.98%
• YTD: 2.84%
• 6M: 3.95%
• 1Y: 10.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BWET

• 1D: 4.26%
• 1M: 9.15%
• YTD: 875.88%
• 6M: 735.56%
• 1Y: 1,800.91%
• 3Y*: 129.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFEB vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
IFEB Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February	2.84%	19.46%	0.54%
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	875.88%	96.22%	-42.48%

Correlation

The correlation between IFEB and BWET is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2024	-0.03

IFEB vs. BWET - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IFEB	BWET
Financial Services	24.7%	8.6%
Industrials	19.8%	-
Healthcare	10.6%	-
Technology	10.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.7%	-
Basic Materials	5.9%	-
Communication Services	4.5%	-
Energy	4.0%	-
Utilities	4.0%	-
Real Estate	1.9%	-

Return for Risk

IFEB vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFEB

IFEB Risk / Return Rank: 39
IFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
IFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
IFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 45
IFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
IFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 41

BWET

BWET Risk / Return Rank: 99
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFEB vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February (IFEB) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IFEB	BWET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	18.57	-17.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	6.55	-4.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.96	-0.68
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.59	59.51	-57.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.51	158.07	-151.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IFEB vs. BWET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFEB Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the BWET Sharpe Ratio of 18.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFEB and BWET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IFEB	BWET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.37	18.57	-17.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.05	1.90	-0.85

Drawdowns

IFEB vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFEB drawdown since its inception was -8.84%, smaller than the maximum BWET drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFEB and BWET.

Drawdown Indicators

	IFEB	BWET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.84%	-56.90%	+48.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.47%	-30.64%	+24.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-56.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.41%	-11.29%	+10.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.68%	-24.09%	+22.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.58%	11.51%	-9.93%

Volatility

IFEB vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February (IFEB) is 2.58%, while Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a volatility of 33.96%. This indicates that IFEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IFEB	BWET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.58%	33.96%	-31.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.52%	88.49%	-81.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.55%	98.35%	-90.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.09%	70.45%	-61.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.09%	70.45%	-61.36%

IFEB vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFEB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

IFEB vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison

Neither IFEB nor BWET has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IFEB and BWET in my portfolio?

IFEB and BWET have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IFEB or BWET?

BWET has higher volatility (33.96%) compared to IFEB (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFEB dropped -8.84% vs BWET's -56.90%.

Which ETF is better, IFEB or BWET?

On 1-year performance, BWET leads with 1800.91% vs 10.26% for IFEB. On fees, IFEB is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, IFEB has been the lower-risk option at 2.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IFEB or BWET?

Over the 1-year period, BWET has performed better with a 1800.91% return vs 10.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IFEB or BWET?

IFEB is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IFEB or BWET?

IFEB and BWET have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between IFEB and BWET?

IFEB is categorized as Options Trading, while BWET is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IFEB and 3.50% for BWET.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.57 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.