PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IFEB vs. AMZY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IFEB vs. AMZY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February (IFEB) and YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFEB achieves a 2.84% return, which is significantly lower than AMZY's 3.56% return.


IFEB

1D
-0.28%
1M
1.98%
YTD
2.84%
6M
3.95%
1Y
10.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMZY

1D
-2.31%
1M
-6.16%
YTD
3.56%
6M
3.86%
1Y
14.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFEB vs. AMZY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IFEB and AMZY is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2024

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IFEB vs. AMZY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFEB
IFEB Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
IFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

AMZY
AMZY Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
AMZY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZY Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZY Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFEB vs. AMZY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February (IFEB) and YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IFEBAMZYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.13

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

0.73

+0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.51

1.81

+4.70

IFEB vs. AMZY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFEB Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the AMZY Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFEB and AMZY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IFEBAMZYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

0.61

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

0.94

+0.10

Drawdowns

IFEB vs. AMZY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFEB drawdown since its inception was -8.84%, smaller than the maximum AMZY drawdown of -23.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFEB and AMZY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IFEBAMZYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.84%

-23.70%

+14.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-19.61%

+13.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-7.53%

+7.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.68%

-5.32%

+3.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

7.88%

-6.30%

Volatility

IFEB vs. AMZY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February (IFEB) is 2.58%, while YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF (AMZY) has a volatility of 6.01%. This indicates that IFEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IFEBAMZYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.58%

6.01%

-3.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.52%

16.09%

-9.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.55%

23.59%

-16.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.09%

25.06%

-15.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.09%

25.06%

-15.97%

IFEB vs. AMZY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFEB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

IFEB vs. AMZY - Dividend Comparison

IFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMZY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 57.72%.


PositionTTM202520242023
AMZY
YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF
57.72%52.59%47.91%9.90%
IFEB
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - February
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IFEB and AMZY have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMZY has higher volatility (6.01%) compared to IFEB (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFEB dropped -8.84% vs AMZY's -23.70%.

On 1-year performance, AMZY leads with 14.23% vs 10.26% for IFEB. On fees, IFEB is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, IFEB has been the lower-risk option at 2.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMZY has performed better with a 14.23% return vs 10.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IFEB is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMZY.

AMZY has the higher dividend yield at 57.72%, compared with 0.00% for IFEB.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IFEB and 0.99% for AMZY.

IFEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFEB and AMZY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer