PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IFAFX vs. INPFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IFAFX vs. INPFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Income Fund of America Class F1 (IFAFX) and American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (INPFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFAFX achieves a 8.42% return, which is significantly higher than INPFX's 5.60% return. Over the past 10 years, IFAFX has outperformed INPFX with an annualized return of 8.27%, while INPFX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.02% annualized return.


IFAFX

1D
0.29%
1M
1.24%
6M
4.60%
YTD
8.42%
1Y
16.21%
3Y*
13.11%
5Y*
8.23%
10Y*
8.27%
ALL TIME*
8.70%

INPFX

1D
0.48%
1M
0.14%
6M
3.63%
YTD
5.60%
1Y
11.79%
3Y*
11.09%
5Y*
6.45%
10Y*
7.02%
ALL TIME*
7.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

IFAFX vs. INPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IFAFX
American Funds Income Fund of America Class F1
8.42%17.71%10.76%6.76%-6.48%17.28%4.40%18.41%-5.33%12.48%
INPFX
American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1
5.60%14.29%9.20%9.46%-8.74%12.90%5.67%15.76%-3.57%11.43%

Correlation

The correlation between IFAFX and INPFX is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2012

0.96

The correlation between IFAFX and INPFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IFAFX vs. INPFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IFAFX
IFAFX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
IFAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
IFAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

INPFX
INPFX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
INPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
INPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
INPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
INPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IFAFX vs. INPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Income Fund of America Class F1 (IFAFX) and American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (INPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IFAFXINPFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.34

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

2.14

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.12

9.03

+0.10

IFAFX vs. INPFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFAFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the INPFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFAFX and INPFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IFAFX vs. INPFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFAFX drawdown since its inception was -41.90%, which is greater than INPFX's maximum drawdown of -21.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFAFX and INPFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IFAFXINPFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.90%

-21.31%

-20.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.11%

-5.20%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.63%

-7.02%

-1.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.84%

-15.37%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.13%

-21.31%

-4.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-0.14%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.91%

-2.28%

-1.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

1.23%

+0.43%

Volatility

IFAFX vs. INPFX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Income Fund of America Class F1 (IFAFX) has a higher volatility of 1.97% compared to American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1 (INPFX) at 1.41%. This indicates that IFAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IFAFXINPFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.97%

1.41%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.85%

4.90%

+0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.39%

6.13%

+1.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.46%

7.54%

+1.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.63%

8.31%

+2.32%

IFAFX vs. INPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFAFX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than INPFX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

IFAFX vs. INPFX - Dividend Comparison

IFAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.25%, more than INPFX's 5.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IFAFX
American Funds Income Fund of America Class F1
9.25%9.91%6.33%2.90%6.94%6.61%2.76%4.95%7.39%4.20%3.01%5.02%
INPFX
American Funds Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio Class F-1
5.39%5.61%5.15%4.76%4.84%4.38%5.54%4.53%4.79%3.25%3.53%3.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


IFAFX and INPFX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IFAFX has higher volatility (1.97%) compared to INPFX (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFAFX dropped -41.90% vs INPFX's -21.31%.

IFAFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFAFX and INPFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer