IEZ vs. MLPI
IEZ (iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF) and MLPI (Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. IEZ is passively managed, while MLPI is actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IEZ charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for MLPI.
Performance
IEZ vs. MLPI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEZ achieves a 47.84% return, which is significantly higher than MLPI's 17.58% return.
IEZ
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -3.54%
- YTD
- 47.84%
- 6M
- 42.02%
- 1Y
- 85.10%
- 3Y*
- 19.17%
- 5Y*
- 13.91%
- 10Y*
- -0.13%
MLPI
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -3.13%
- YTD
- 17.58%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IEZ vs. MLPI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IEZ iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF | 47.84% | 2.56% |
MLPI Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF | 17.58% | 0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEZ and MLPI is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IEZ vs. MLPI — Risk / Return Rank
IEZ
MLPI
IEZ vs. MLPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF (IEZ) and Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IEZ | MLPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.29 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.60 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IEZ | MLPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.04 | 3.49 | -3.52 |
Drawdowns
IEZ vs. MLPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEZ drawdown since its inception was -92.52%, which is greater than MLPI's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEZ and MLPI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEZ | MLPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.52% | -5.38% | -87.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.21% | -3.84% | -47.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.26% | -1.27% | -46.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.78% | — | — |
Volatility
IEZ vs. MLPI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IEZ | MLPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.95% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.11% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.62% | 13.05% | +15.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.35% | 13.05% | +23.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.56% | 13.05% | +28.51% |
IEZ vs. MLPI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEZ has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPI's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
IEZ vs. MLPI - Dividend Comparison
IEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than MLPI's 6.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEZ iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF | 1.18% | 1.87% | 1.76% | 0.97% | 0.65% | 1.20% | 2.07% | 2.28% | 1.81% | 3.42% | 0.91% | 2.40% |
MLPI Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF | 6.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IEZ and MLPI have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IEZ is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IEZ is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MLPI.
MLPI has the higher dividend yield at 6.04%, compared with 1.18% for IEZ.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IEZ and 0.68% for MLPI.
Find the right allocation for IEZ and MLPI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer