PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEVL.L vs. CEMQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEVL.L vs. CEMQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (IEVL.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Quality Factor UCITS ETF (CEMQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEVL.L achieves a 13.95% return, which is significantly higher than CEMQ.DE's 4.17% return. Over the past 10 years, IEVL.L has outperformed CEMQ.DE with an annualized return of 10.70%, while CEMQ.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 7.82% annualized return.


IEVL.L

1D
0.04%
1M
4.59%
YTD
13.95%
6M
17.06%
1Y
32.80%
3Y*
21.63%
5Y*
14.48%
10Y*
10.70%

CEMQ.DE

1D
0.82%
1M
1.24%
YTD
4.17%
6M
5.97%
1Y
6.77%
3Y*
7.83%
5Y*
5.86%
10Y*
7.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEVL.L vs. CEMQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEVL.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating
13.95%35.00%10.59%13.55%-3.79%26.68%-8.75%21.75%-13.48%10.41%
CEMQ.DE
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Quality Factor UCITS ETF
4.17%10.17%3.72%14.50%-11.87%26.64%1.09%32.48%-7.31%10.34%

Correlation

The correlation between IEVL.L and CEMQ.DE is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2015

0.80

The correlation between IEVL.L and CEMQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEVL.L vs. CEMQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEVL.L
IEVL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IEVL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEVL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEVL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
IEVL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEVL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

CEMQ.DE
CEMQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
CEMQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEMQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEMQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
CEMQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEMQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEVL.L vs. CEMQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (IEVL.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Quality Factor UCITS ETF (CEMQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEVL.LCEMQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.11

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

0.80

+2.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.45

2.14

+10.32

IEVL.L vs. CEMQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEVL.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the CEMQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEVL.L and CEMQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEVL.LCEMQ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

0.57

+1.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.41

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.52

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.48

+0.01

Drawdowns

IEVL.L vs. CEMQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEVL.L drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, which is greater than CEMQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEVL.L and CEMQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEVL.LCEMQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.09%

-33.74%

-6.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.78%

-8.40%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.49%

-14.90%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.55%

-19.69%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.09%

-33.74%

-6.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-2.60%

+1.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.51%

-5.35%

-2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

3.17%

-0.54%

Volatility

IEVL.L vs. CEMQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR Accumulating (IEVL.L) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Europe Quality Factor UCITS ETF (CEMQ.DE) at 3.97%. This indicates that IEVL.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEMQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEVL.LCEMQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.86%

3.97%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.95%

9.53%

+1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.70%

11.93%

+1.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.36%

14.02%

+1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.66%

15.02%

+2.64%

IEVL.L vs. CEMQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IEVL.L and CEMQ.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IEVL.L vs. CEMQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IEVL.L nor CEMQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IEVL.L and CEMQ.DE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IEVL.L and CEMQ.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

IEVL.L tracks MSCI Europe Enhanced Value Index, while CEMQ.DE tracks MSCI Europe Sector Neutral Quality.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEVL.L and CEMQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer