PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEVAX vs. PGVFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEVAX vs. PGVFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Global Value Fund (IEVAX) and Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEVAX achieves a 11.01% return, which is significantly lower than PGVFX's 20.95% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IEVAX having a 10.54% annualized return and PGVFX not far ahead at 11.05%.


IEVAX

1D
2.37%
1M
1.21%
6M
6.87%
YTD
11.01%
1Y
20.23%
3Y*
15.80%
5Y*
10.22%
10Y*
10.54%
ALL TIME*
8.33%

PGVFX

1D
0.38%
1M
0.65%
6M
13.01%
YTD
20.95%
1Y
39.07%
3Y*
19.16%
5Y*
10.74%
10Y*
11.05%
ALL TIME*
8.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

IEVAX vs. PGVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEVAX
Columbia Global Value Fund
11.01%21.42%11.78%12.00%-8.52%20.31%3.77%24.55%-12.22%21.93%
PGVFX
Polaris Global Value Fund
20.95%27.01%5.33%14.76%-12.00%15.38%6.65%22.83%-12.64%20.60%

Correlation

The correlation between IEVAX and PGVFX is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 1998

0.77

The correlation between IEVAX and PGVFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.85 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEVAX vs. PGVFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IEVAX
IEVAX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IEVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
IEVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

PGVFX
PGVFX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
PGVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
PGVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IEVAX vs. PGVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Global Value Fund (IEVAX) and Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IEVAXPGVFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.55

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

4.21

-1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.74

15.79

-6.05

IEVAX vs. PGVFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEVAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is lower than the PGVFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEVAX and PGVFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IEVAX vs. PGVFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEVAX drawdown since its inception was -56.85%, smaller than the maximum PGVFX drawdown of -68.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEVAX and PGVFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEVAXPGVFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.85%

-68.09%

+11.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.80%

-8.76%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.12%

-12.53%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.58%

-27.58%

+7.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.88%

-41.26%

+3.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.86%

+0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.42%

-11.24%

+2.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

2.34%

-0.30%

Volatility

IEVAX vs. PGVFX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Global Value Fund (IEVAX) has a higher volatility of 3.83% compared to Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX) at 3.42%. This indicates that IEVAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PGVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEVAXPGVFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.83%

3.42%

+0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.42%

10.71%

-1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.37%

12.46%

-1.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.11%

13.84%

+0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.45%

15.63%

+0.82%

IEVAX vs. PGVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEVAX has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than PGVFX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

IEVAX vs. PGVFX - Dividend Comparison

IEVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.01%, more than PGVFX's 4.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEVAX
Columbia Global Value Fund
12.01%10.06%10.32%6.26%7.61%11.24%8.76%9.16%6.75%1.66%2.28%4.68%
PGVFX
Polaris Global Value Fund
4.28%5.17%5.65%1.68%3.55%4.05%1.55%3.69%3.39%1.50%1.32%1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEVAX and PGVFX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IEVAX has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to PGVFX (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEVAX dropped -56.85% vs PGVFX's -68.09%.

PGVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEVAX and PGVFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer