IEVAX vs. CSUAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Global Value Fund (IEVAX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX).
IEVAX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Mar 19, 1995. CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017.
Performance
IEVAX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IEVAX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEVAX Columbia Global Value Fund | -3.43% | 21.42% | 11.78% | 12.00% | -8.52% | 20.31% | 3.77% | 24.55% | -12.22% | 21.93% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 8.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEVAX achieves a -3.43% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 8.35% return. Over the past 10 years, IEVAX has outperformed CSUAX with an annualized return of 9.28%, while CSUAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.48% annualized return.
IEVAX
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -8.60%
- YTD
- -3.43%
- 6M
- 0.21%
- 1Y
- 15.03%
- 3Y*
- 12.73%
- 5Y*
- 8.11%
- 10Y*
- 9.28%
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IEVAX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEVAX has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IEVAX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank
IEVAX
CSUAX
IEVAX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Global Value Fund (IEVAX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IEVAX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.05 | 1.63 | -0.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 2.17 | -0.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.32 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 2.36 | -1.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.56 | 10.32 | -4.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IEVAX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.05 | 1.63 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.61 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.50 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.55 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between IEVAX and CSUAX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IEVAX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison
IEVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.09%, more than CSUAX's 7.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEVAX Columbia Global Value Fund | 11.09% | 10.06% | 10.32% | 6.26% | 7.61% | 11.24% | 8.76% | 9.16% | 6.75% | 1.66% | 2.28% | 4.68% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.46% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
Drawdowns
IEVAX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEVAX drawdown since its inception was -56.85%, which is greater than CSUAX's maximum drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEVAX and CSUAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEVAX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.85% | -52.20% | -4.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.17% | -7.98% | -4.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.58% | -20.45% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.88% | -35.05% | -2.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.80% | -4.38% | -4.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.50% | -8.49% | -0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 1.83% | +0.69% |
Volatility
IEVAX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Global Value Fund (IEVAX) has a higher volatility of 4.26% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 3.26%. This indicates that IEVAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IEVAX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.26% | 3.26% | +1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.65% | 6.89% | +0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.70% | 11.48% | +3.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.01% | 12.89% | +1.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.57% | 14.89% | +1.68% |