PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEV vs. EWL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEV vs. EWL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Europe ETF (IEV) and iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEV achieves a 6.59% return, which is significantly higher than EWL's 3.17% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IEV having a 9.15% annualized return and EWL not far ahead at 9.39%.


IEV

1D
1.15%
1M
2.48%
YTD
6.59%
6M
9.69%
1Y
18.09%
3Y*
16.65%
5Y*
8.80%
10Y*
9.15%

EWL

1D
1.58%
1M
1.23%
YTD
3.17%
6M
6.82%
1Y
13.44%
3Y*
11.88%
5Y*
6.66%
10Y*
9.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEV vs. EWL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEV
iShares Europe ETF
6.59%35.63%1.36%20.14%-14.24%16.73%4.07%24.03%-14.68%24.84%
EWL
iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF
3.17%32.92%-2.80%17.67%-18.89%20.20%11.80%31.58%-9.21%23.34%

Correlation

The correlation between IEV and EWL is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2000

0.80

The correlation between IEV and EWL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

IEV vs. EWL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IEV
EWL

Financial Services

23.9%
18.6%

Industrials

19.3%
12.0%

Healthcare

13.1%
38.8%

Technology

8.7%
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

8.3%
14.9%

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
5.4%

Basic Materials

5.7%
6.6%

Energy

5.6%

-

Utilities

5.0%
0.4%

Communication Services

2.9%
1.3%

Real Estate

0.8%
0.9%

Financial Services

IEV
23.9%
EWL
18.6%

Industrials

IEV
19.3%
EWL
12.0%

Healthcare

IEV
13.1%
EWL
38.8%

Technology

IEV
8.7%
EWL
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

IEV
8.3%
EWL
14.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IEV
6.7%
EWL
5.4%

Basic Materials

IEV
5.7%
EWL
6.6%

Energy

IEV
5.6%
EWL

-

Utilities

IEV
5.0%
EWL
0.4%

Communication Services

IEV
2.9%
EWL
1.3%

Real Estate

IEV
0.8%
EWL
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEV vs. EWL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEV
IEV Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
IEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEV Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
IEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEV Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

EWL
EWL Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
EWL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWL Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
EWL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWL Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEV vs. EWL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Europe ETF (IEV) and iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEVEWLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.16

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

1.00

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.40

3.25

+2.14

IEV vs. EWL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEV Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is higher than the EWL Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEV and EWL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEVEWLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

0.86

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.42

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.57

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.35

-0.12

Drawdowns

IEV vs. EWL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEV drawdown since its inception was -63.27%, which is greater than EWL's maximum drawdown of -51.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEV and EWL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEVEWLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.27%

-51.62%

-11.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-13.48%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.63%

-13.48%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.60%

-28.99%

-1.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.62%

-28.99%

-7.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.65%

-4.95%

+3.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.04%

-11.09%

-3.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.36%

4.14%

-0.78%

Volatility

IEV vs. EWL - Volatility Comparison

iShares Europe ETF (IEV) has a higher volatility of 5.56% compared to iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL) at 5.14%. This indicates that IEV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEVEWLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.56%

5.14%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.99%

12.30%

+0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.62%

15.76%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.58%

16.07%

+1.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.66%

16.47%

+2.19%

IEV vs. EWL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEV has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than EWL's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IEV vs. EWL - Dividend Comparison

IEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, more than EWL's 1.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWL
iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF
1.65%1.71%2.21%2.12%2.04%1.73%1.45%1.85%2.56%2.05%2.75%2.58%
IEV
iShares Europe ETF
2.56%2.73%3.10%2.77%3.06%2.81%1.76%3.06%3.43%2.39%3.08%2.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEV and EWL have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IEV has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to EWL (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEV dropped -63.27% vs EWL's -51.62%.

On 10-year performance, EWL leads with 9.39% vs 9.15% for IEV. On fees, EWL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EWL has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWL has performed better with a 9.39% return vs 9.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IEV.

IEV has the higher dividend yield at 2.56%, compared with 1.65% for EWL.

IEV tracks S&P Europe 350 Index, while EWL tracks MSCI Switzerland Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for IEV and 0.50% for EWL.

IEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEV and EWL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer