EWL vs. TILGX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX).
EWL is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Switzerland Index. It was launched on Mar 12, 1996. TILGX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Mar 31, 2006.
Performance
EWL vs. TILGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EWL vs. TILGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWL iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF | -1.92% | 32.92% | -2.80% | 17.67% | -18.89% | 20.20% | 11.80% | 31.58% | -9.21% | 23.34% |
TILGX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class | -11.95% | 15.25% | 29.23% | 47.05% | -32.76% | 16.84% | 44.23% | 30.76% | -0.38% | 33.89% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWL achieves a -1.92% return, which is significantly higher than TILGX's -11.95% return. Over the past 10 years, EWL has underperformed TILGX with an annualized return of 9.38%, while TILGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.55% annualized return.
EWL
- 1D
- 2.24%
- 1M
- -9.63%
- YTD
- -1.92%
- 6M
- 6.46%
- 1Y
- 15.70%
- 3Y*
- 11.32%
- 5Y*
- 7.64%
- 10Y*
- 9.38%
TILGX
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -8.17%
- YTD
- -11.95%
- 6M
- -10.69%
- 1Y
- 14.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.08%
- 10Y*
- 14.55%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EWL vs. TILGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TILGX's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EWL vs. TILGX — Risk / Return Rank
EWL
TILGX
EWL vs. TILGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL) and TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWL | TILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.93 | 0.65 | +0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.38 | 1.09 | +0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.15 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | 0.70 | +0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.08 | 2.38 | +1.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWL | TILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 0.65 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.37 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.68 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.52 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between EWL and TILGX is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
EWL vs. TILGX - Dividend Comparison
EWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, less than TILGX's 15.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWL iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF | 1.74% | 1.71% | 2.21% | 2.12% | 2.04% | 1.73% | 1.45% | 1.85% | 2.56% | 2.05% | 2.75% | 2.58% |
TILGX TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class | 15.76% | 13.87% | 6.41% | 0.22% | 0.42% | 10.49% | 37.04% | 4.41% | 14.12% | 3.83% | 1.82% | 3.80% |
Drawdowns
EWL vs. TILGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWL drawdown since its inception was -51.62%, roughly equal to the maximum TILGX drawdown of -52.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWL and TILGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWL | TILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.62% | -52.16% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.48% | -15.19% | +1.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.99% | -37.86% | +8.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.99% | -37.86% | +8.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.63% | -15.19% | +5.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.12% | -8.90% | -2.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.48% | 4.47% | -0.99% |
Volatility
EWL vs. TILGX - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF (EWL) has a higher volatility of 6.66% compared to TIAA-CREF Large-Cap Growth Fund Institutional Class (TILGX) at 5.15%. This indicates that EWL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TILGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EWL | TILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.66% | 5.15% | +1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.81% | 12.16% | -1.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.95% | 22.10% | -5.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.86% | 21.90% | -6.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 21.56% | -5.20% |