IEUR vs. AAXJ
IEUR (iShares Core MSCI Europe ETF) and AAXJ (iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IEUR is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Investable Market Index, while AAXJ is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IEUR returned 10.11%/yr vs 10.34%/yr for AAXJ. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IEUR charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for AAXJ.
Performance
IEUR vs. AAXJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEUR achieves a 7.65% return, which is significantly lower than AAXJ's 26.46% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IEUR having a 10.11% annualized return and AAXJ not far ahead at 10.34%.
IEUR
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- YTD
- 7.65%
- 6M
- 9.78%
- 1Y
- 19.09%
- 3Y*
- 16.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.26%
- 10Y*
- 10.11%
AAXJ
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- 26.46%
- 6M
- 29.76%
- 1Y
- 48.69%
- 3Y*
- 22.11%
- 5Y*
- 6.41%
- 10Y*
- 10.34%
IEUR vs. AAXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEUR iShares Core MSCI Europe ETF | 7.65% | 35.67% | 1.40% | 19.71% | -15.90% | 16.71% | 5.31% | 24.95% | -14.86% | 26.70% |
AAXJ iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF | 26.46% | 31.53% | 10.41% | 4.79% | -20.35% | -5.73% | 23.35% | 17.93% | -15.04% | 41.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEUR and AAXJ is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014 | 0.70 |
The correlation between IEUR and AAXJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
IEUR vs. AAXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IEUR
AAXJ
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
IEUR
AAXJ
Industrials
IEUR
AAXJ
Healthcare
IEUR
AAXJ
Technology
IEUR
AAXJ
Consumer Defensive
IEUR
AAXJ
Consumer Cyclical
IEUR
AAXJ
Basic Materials
IEUR
AAXJ
Energy
IEUR
AAXJ
Utilities
IEUR
AAXJ
Communication Services
IEUR
AAXJ
Real Estate
IEUR
AAXJ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IEUR vs. AAXJ — Risk / Return Rank
IEUR
AAXJ
IEUR vs. AAXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Europe ETF (IEUR) and iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IEUR | AAXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.40 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 3.41 | -1.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.40 | 12.55 | -7.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IEUR vs. AAXJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEUR drawdown since its inception was -36.96%, smaller than the maximum AAXJ drawdown of -49.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEUR and AAXJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEUR | AAXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.96% | -49.37% | +12.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.04% | -13.66% | +1.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.25% | -19.74% | +5.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.75% | -40.64% | +7.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.96% | -44.52% | +7.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -4.62% | +4.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.21% | -14.01% | +5.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.22% | 3.71% | -0.49% |
Volatility
IEUR vs. AAXJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Europe ETF (IEUR) is 5.70%, while iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF (AAXJ) has a volatility of 11.46%. This indicates that IEUR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IEUR | AAXJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.70% | 11.46% | -5.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.31% | 19.71% | -6.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.83% | 22.12% | -6.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.81% | 20.32% | -2.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.68% | 20.42% | -1.74% |
IEUR vs. AAXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEUR has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than AAXJ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
IEUR vs. AAXJ - Dividend Comparison
IEUR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than AAXJ's 1.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAXJ iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex-Japan ETF | 1.43% | 1.81% | 1.86% | 1.95% | 1.74% | 2.21% | 1.06% | 1.83% | 2.10% | 1.99% | 1.77% | 2.44% |
IEUR iShares Core MSCI Europe ETF | 2.76% | 2.97% | 3.54% | 3.17% | 3.05% | 2.88% | 2.13% | 3.26% | 3.76% | 2.64% | 3.19% | 2.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IEUR and AAXJ have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AAXJ has higher volatility (11.46%) compared to IEUR (5.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEUR dropped -36.96% vs AAXJ's -49.37%.
On 10-year performance, AAXJ leads with 10.34% vs 10.11% for IEUR. On fees, IEUR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IEUR has been the lower-risk option at 5.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, AAXJ has performed better with a 10.34% return vs 10.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IEUR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AAXJ.
IEUR has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 1.43% for AAXJ.
IEUR is categorized as Europe Equities, while AAXJ is Asia Pacific Equities. IEUR tracks MSCI Europe Investable Market Index, while AAXJ tracks MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IEUR and 0.68% for AAXJ.
AAXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IEUR and AAXJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer